JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gin, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gin, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Anesth Analg 2001;92:224-227
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

A Prospective Survey of Patients after Cessation of Patient-Controlled Analgesia

Phoon Ping Chen, FANZCA, FHKCA, FHKAM, Po Tong Chui, FANZCA, FHKCA, FHKAM, Marlene Ma, RN, BHSc, and Tony Gin, MD, FANZCA, FRCA, FHKCA, FHKAM

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong SAR

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Phoon P. Chen, FANZCA, FHKCA, FHKAM, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care & Operating Services, Alice Ho Miu Ling Hospital, Tai Po, N.T., Hong Kong SAR. Address e-mail to ppchen{at}cuhk.edu.hk

Cessation of IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the postoperative period is often an arbitrary clinical decision. We conducted a prospective survey of patients 24 h after cessation of IV PCA morphine to determine whether they wished to be restarted on PCA, and to evaluate factors affecting this decision. One hundred and fifteen patients were surveyed over a 3-mo period. Thirty-eight patients (33%) wished to restart PCA. The most common reason was the expectation that IV PCA would be more effective. Age, sex, type of surgery, duration of PCA use, side effects, pain scores, and reasons for cessation of PCA did not affect the decision. The reasons given by those who did not wish to restart PCA were minimal pain (51.9%), inconvenient PCA machine (15.6%), ineffective analgesia by IV PCA (11.7%), side effects during PCA (11.7%), and wishing to tolerate pain (7.8%). PCA morphine consumption in the 24-h period before cessation of PCA (mean [SD]) was larger in patients wishing to restart PCA than in those who did not (21.1 [14.8] mg vs 15.1 [15.1] mg; P < 0.05). In conclusion, the clinical decisions to cease IV PCA do not predict patient acceptance of and satisfaction with the decision and with subsequent pain treatment. Morphine consumption may predict a patient’s acceptance of ceasing PCA.

Implications: We surveyed patients 24 h after cessation of IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This survey revealed that the usual clinical reasons to stop IV PCA might not be the most appropriate. Patients have different reasons why they wish to restart or not restart IV PCA. The cessation of PCA should be individualized.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. A. Strassels, C. Chen, and D. B. Carr
Postoperative Analgesia: Economics, Resource Use, and Patient Satisfaction in an Urban Teaching Hospital
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2002; 94(1): 130 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.