JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fazi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Watcha, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fazi, L.
Right arrow Articles by Watcha, M. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pediatrics
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;92:56-61
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

A Comparison of Oral Clonidine and Oral Midazolam as Preanesthetic Medications in the Pediatric Tonsillectomy Patient

Lisa Fazi, MD, Ellen C. Jantzen, MD, John B. Rose, MD, C. Dean Kurth, MD, and Mehernoor F. Watcha, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Address correspondence to Mehernoor F. Watcha, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Address e-mail to watcha{at}email.chop.edu

We compared the effects of oral clonidine (4 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) on the preanesthetic sedation and postoperative recovery profile in children during tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. In a double-blinded, double-dummy study design, 134 ASA physical status I-II children aged 4–12 yr were randomized to receive a combination of either clonidine and placebo (Group A), or placebo and midazolam (Group B) at 60–90 min and 30 min, respectively, before the induction of anesthesia. Children in the clonidine group exhibited more intense anxiety on separation and during induction of anesthesia via a mask as measured by the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scores. They also had significantly lower mean intraoperative arterial blood pressures, shorter surgery, anesthesia, and emergence times, and a decreased need for supplemental oxygen during recovery compared with the midazolam group. However, the clonidine group had larger postoperative opioid requirements, maximum excitement and pain scores based on the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario scale in the Phase 1 postanesthetic care unit. There were no differences between the two groups in the times to discharge readiness, postoperative emesis, unanticipated hospital admission rates, postdischarge maximum pain scores, and 24 h analgesic requirements. The percentage of parents who were completely satisfied with the child’s preoperative experience was significantly higher in the midazolam group. There were no differences in parental satisfaction with the recovery period. We conclude that under the conditions of this study, oral midazolam is superior to oral clonidine as a preanesthetic medication in this patient population.

Implications: We compared preanesthetic sedation and postoperative recovery after oral clonidine (4 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) in children during tonsillectomy. The clonidine group had greater preoperative anxiety and shorter surgery and anesthesia times, but required more postoperative analgesia. Delayed recovery and discharge times did not differ. Midazolam was superior to clonidine as oral preanesthetic medication for these patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Tazeroualti, F. De Groote, S. De Hert, A. De Ville, A. Dierick, and P. Van der Linden
Oral clonidine vs midazolam in the prevention of sevoflurane-induced agitation in children. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2007; 98(5): 667 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Vlajkovic and R. P. Sindjelic
Emergence Delirium in Children: Many Questions, Few Answers
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2007; 104(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Voepel-Lewis, S. Malviya, and A. R. Tait
A Prospective Cohort Study of Emergence Agitation in the Pediatric Postanesthesia Care Unit
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1625 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Bock, P. Kunz, R. Schreckenberger, B. M. Graf, E. Martin, and J. Motsch
Comparison of caudal and intravenous clonidine in the prevention of agitation after sevoflurane in children{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2002; 88(6): 790 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.