JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calderón, E.
Right arrow Articles by Torres, L.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calderón, E.
Right arrow Articles by Torres, L.-M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;92:715-719
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

A Comparison of Two Constant-Dose Continuous Infusions of Remifentanil for Severe Postoperative Pain

Enrique Calderón, MD, PhD, Antonio Pernia, MD, Pedro De Antonio, MD, Enrique Calderón-Pla, MD, and Luis-Miguel Torres, MD

Anesthesiology Department, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, Cádiz, Spain

Address correspondence to E. Calderon, MD, PhD, Hospital U. Puerta del Mar, Avd Ana de Viya 21. 10. 09—Cádiz, Spain.

We evaluated the analgesic efficacy and safety of two continuous constant-dose infusions of IV remifentanil, without infusion rate increments or the addition of boluses, in patients with severe postoperative pain during the first 4 h after general anesthesia with IV propofol-remifentanil. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 15 subjects each according to the remifentanil dose administered: 0.1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV (Group A) or 0.05 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV (Group B). Rescue analgesia was provided with meperidine (0.5 mg/kg IV) when pain intensity on the simple verbal scale (SVS) >=2. The criteria for adequate analgesia (SVS 0–1, respiratory frequency >8/min. and SpO2 >90%) after 4 h were met by 78% and 75% of the patients in Groups A and B, respectively (P = ns). "Meperidine rescue" analgesia was significantly more in Group B (26%) than in Group A (6%) (P < 0.05). There were no cases of respiratory depression, and nausea and emesis occurred in one patient in each group (6.5%). We conclude that IV remifentanil is an effective and safe opioid for the treatment of postoperative pain at a constant dose of 0.1 µg · kg-1 · min-1 with a need for rescue analgesia 4 times less than a constant dose of 0.05 µg · kg-1 · min-1.

Implications: Our study suggests that the use of a constant continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1 µg·kg-1·min-1IV is an effective alternative in the treatment of severe postoperative pain.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Singler, A. Troster, N. Manering, J. Schuttler, and W. Koppert
Modulation of Remifentanil-Induced Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by Propofol
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1397 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. N. Koo, S. H. Choi, D. H. Chun, H. K. Kil, K. J. Kim, K. T. Min, and S. J. Lee
Respiratory Depression Caused by Remifentanil Infusion for Postoperative Pain Control
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1627 - 1628.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.