JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;92:1024-1028
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE

A Comparison of Ropivacaine with Fentanyl to Bupivacaine with Fentanyl for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia

Peter S. Hodgson, MD*, and Spencer S. Liu, MD*{dagger}

Departments of Anesthesiology, *Virginia Mason Medical Center; and {dagger}University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Address correspondence to Dr. Spencer S. Liu, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., P.O. Box 900, Mail Stop B2-AN, Seattle, WA 98111. Address e mail to anessl{at}vmmc.org

Ropivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) may facilitate postoperative patient mobilization because it causes less motor block than bupivacaine. Forty patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomized in a double-blinded manner to the following: 0.05% bupivacaine/4 µg fentanyl, 0.1% bupivacaine/fentanyl, 0.05% ropivacaine/fentanyl, or 0.1% ropivacaine/fentanyl for standardized PCEA. We measured pain scores, side effects, and PCEA consumption for 42 h. Lower-extremity motor function was assessed with electromyography and isometric force dynamometry. Analgesia was equivalent among groups. Local anesthetic use was more in the 0.1% Ropivacaine and 0.1% Bupivacaine groups (77% increase, P = 0.001). Motor function decreased during PCEA (10%–35% decrease from preoperative, P < 0.001) and was equivalent among groups. Eight patients were transiently unable to ambulate. These patients used more local anesthetic (45 vs 33 mg mean, P < 0.05) with additional decrease in motor function (32%, P < 0.004) compared with ambulating patients. Other side effects were mild and equivalent among solutions. PCEA with bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl as 0.05% or 0.1% solutions appears clinically equipotent. Lower-extremity motor function decreases, but is unlikely to result in prolonged inability to ambulate. Use of a 0.05% solution may be advantageous to decrease local anesthetic use and prevent transient motor block.

Implications: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl as either 0.05% or 0.1% solutions are clinically similar. Lower-extremity motor function will decrease with the use of any of these combinations, but is unlikely to result in the inability to walk.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Iijima, T. Ishiyama, S. Kashimoto, T. Yamaguchi, T. Andoh, K. Hanawa, I. Tanzawa, K. Kawata, T. Hanawa, and Y. Hiejima
A Comparison of Three Different Concentrations of Ropivacaine with Fentanyl for Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 507 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Schuster, A. Gottschalk, M. Freitag, and T. Standl
Cost Drivers in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management After Major Surgery
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 708 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris
Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Macias, P. Monedero, M. Adame, W. Torre, I. Fidalgo, and F. Hidalgo
A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine, Ropivacaine/Fentanyl, or Bupivacaine/Fentanyl for Postthoracotomy Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2002; 95(5): 1344 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, J. L. Joris, D. Ledoux, P. J. Toussaint, B. Lahaye-Goffart, and M. L. Lamy
A Comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine Combined with Morphine for Postoperative Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia After Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2002; 95(2): 444 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. Casati, S. Fernandez-Galinski, E. Barrera, O. Pol, and M. M. Puig
Isoflurane Requirements During Combined General/Epidural Anesthesia for Major Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1331 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.