| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


Departments of *Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and
Neurosurgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Haim Berkenstadt, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel 52621. Address e-mail to berken{at}netvision.net.il
Changes in arterial blood pressure induced by mechanical ventilation allow assessment of cardiac preload. In this study, stroke volume variation (SVV), which is the percentage change between the maximal and minimal stroke volumes (SV) divided by the average of the minimum and maximum over a floating period of 30 s, continuously displayed by the PiCCO continuous cardiac output monitor, was evaluated as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Fifteen patients undergoing brain surgery were included. During surgery, graded volume loading was performed with each volume loading step (VLS) consisting of 100 mL of 6% hydroxyethylstarch given for 2 min. Successive responsive VLSs were performed (increase in SV > 5% after a VLS) until a change in SV of <5% was reached (nonresponsive). A total of 140 VLSs were performed. Responsive and nonresponsive VLSs differed in their pre-VLS values of systolic blood pressure, SV, and SVV, but not in the values of heart rate and central venous pressure. By using receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve for SVV (0.870, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.809 to 0.903) was statistically more than those for central venous pressure (0.493, 95% CI: 0.397 to 0.590, P = 7 x 10-10), heart rate (0.593, 95% CI: 0.443 to 0.635, P = 5.7 x 10-10), and systolic blood pressure (0.729, 95% CI: 0.645 to 0.813, P = 4.3 x 10-3). An SVV value of 9.5% or more, will predict an increase in the SV of at least 5% in response to a 100-mL volume load, with a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 93%.
Implications: Stroke volume variation may be used as a continuous preload variable and in combination with the continuously measured cardiac output, defining on-line the most important characteristics of cardiac function, allowing for optimal fluid management.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Biais, K. Nouette-Gaulain, V. Cottenceau, P. Revel, and F. Sztark Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2008; 101(6): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. Marik, M. Baram, and B. Vahid Does Central Venous Pressure Predict Fluid Responsiveness?: A Systematic Review of the Literature and the Tale of Seven Mares Chest, July 1, 2008; 134(1): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Miller, N. Coleman, A. Morelli, C. Ertmer, and M. Westphal Dobutamine and terlipressin in patients with septic shock Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2008; 101(1): 125 - 126. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. O. Auler Jr., F. Galas, L. Hajjar, L. Santos, T. Carvalho, and F. Michard Online Monitoring of Pulse Pressure Variation to Guide Fluid Therapy After Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1201 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Davison and C. Junker Advances in Critical Care for the Nephrologist: Hemodynamic Monitoring and Volume Management Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 554 - 561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Deflandre, V. Bonhomme, and P. Hans Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2008; 100(2): 245 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Pinsky Hemodynamic Evaluation and Monitoring in the ICU Chest, December 1, 2007; 132(6): 2020 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Kubitz, T. Annecke, S. Forkl, G. I. Kemming, N. Kronas, A. E. Goetz, and D. A. Reuter Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2007; 98(5): 591 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Solus-Biguenet, M. Fleyfel, B. Tavernier, E. Kipnis, J. Onimus, E. Robin, G. Lebuffe, C. Decoene, F. R. Pruvot, and B. Vallet Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2006; 97(6): 808 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. De Castro, J.-P. Goarin, L. Lhotel, N. Mabrouk, A. Perel, and P. Coriat Comparison of stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume respiratory variation (SVV) measured by the axillary artery pulse-contour method and by aortic Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing aortic surgery Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2006; 97(5): 605 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Natalini, A. Rosano, M. E. Franceschetti, P. Facchetti, and A. Bernardini Variations in Arterial Blood Pressure and Photoplethysmography During Mechanical Ventilation Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1182 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Kubitz, T. Annecke, G. I. Kemming, S. Forkl, N. Kronas, A. E. Goetz, and D. A. Reuter The influence of positive end-expiratory pressure on stroke volume variation and central blood volume during open and closed chest conditions. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Hansen, E. Sloth, J. Nielsen, J. Koefoed-Nielsen, P. Lambert, S. Lunde, and A. Larsson Selective Recruitment Maneuvers for Lobar Atelectasis: Effects on Lung Function and Central Hemodynamics: An Experimental Study in Pigs. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1504 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Charron, C. Fessenmeyer, C. Cosson, J.-X. Mazoit, J.-L. Hebert, D. Benhamou, and A. R. Edouard The Influence of Tidal Volume on the Dynamic Variables of Fluid Responsiveness in Critically Ill Patients. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1511 - 1517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Spahn and P.-G. Chassot CON: Fluid Restriction for Cardiac Patients During Major Noncardiac Surgery Should be Replaced by Goal-Directed Intravascular Fluid Administration Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 344 - 346. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Reuter and A. E. Goetz Differentiating "Volumetric Preload Monitoring" and Assessing "Fluid Responsiveness" Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 651 - 652. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Preisman, S. Kogan, H. Berkenstadt, and A. Perel Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 746 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Michard Volume Management Using Dynamic Parameters Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 1902 - 1903. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Hofer, S. M. Muller, L. Furrer, R. Klaghofer, M. Genoni, and A. Zollinger Stroke Volume and Pulse Pressure Variation for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 848 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Berkenstadt, Z. Friedman, S. Preisman, I. Keidan, D. Livingstone, and A. Perel Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 721 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rex, S. Brose, S. Metzelder, R. Huneke, G. Schalte, R. Autschbach, R. Rossaint, and W. Buhre Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 782 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Michard, U. Schmidt, K. Bendjelid, and J.-A. Romand Prediction of fluid responsiveness: searching for the Holy Grail J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2004; 97(2): 790 - 791. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Reuter, T. Goresch, M. S. G. Goepfert, S. M. Wildhirt, E. Kilger, and A. E. Goetz Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 808 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Magder Clinical Usefulness of Respiratory Variations in Arterial Pressure Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 151 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Bouteau, B. Tavernier, C. Wiesenack, and C. Keyl Stroke Volume Variation as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness * Response Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 278 - 279. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Pinsky Probing the Limits of Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis to Predict Preload Responsiveness Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1245 - 1247. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wiesenack, C. Prasser, G. Rodig, and C. Keyl Stroke Volume Variation as an Indicator of Fluid Responsiveness Using Pulse Contour Analysis in Mechanically Ventilated Patients Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1254 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Reuter, T. W. Felbinger, E. Kilger, C. Schmidt, P. Lamm, and A. E. Goetz Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2002; 88(1): 124 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|