JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernández-Palazón, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Flores, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernández-Palazón, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Flores, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surgery
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;92:1473-1476
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Intravenous Administration of Propacetamol Reduces Morphine Consumption After Spinal Fusion Surgery

Joaquín Hernández-Palazón, MD, PhD*, José A. Tortosa, MD, PhD*, Juan F. Martínez-Lage, MD{dagger}, and Domingo Pérez-Flores, MD, PhD{ddagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Neurosurgery, Hospital Universitario ‘Virgen de la Arrixaca,‘ Murcia, Spain; and {ddagger}Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

Address correspondence and reprint requests to José A. Tortosa, MD, PhD, C/Ricardo Gil 26, 2° B, 30 002 Murcia, Spain. Address e-mail to isv01mu{at}nacom.es

We sought to determine the analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effects, and tolerability of propacetamol, an injectable prodrug of acetaminophen, in combination with morphine administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after spinal fusion surgery. Forty-two patients undergoing spinal stabilization surgery were randomized into two groups, which were given either an IV placebo or an IV injection of 2 g propacetamol every 6 h for 3 days after surgery. The postoperative opioid analgesic requirement was assessed with a PCA device used to self-administer morphine. Pain relief was evaluated by a visual analog pain scale and by verbal rating scores of pain relief at 8-h intervals for up to 72 h after surgery. The cumulative dose of morphine at 72 h was smaller in the Propacetamol group than in the Placebo group (60.3 ± 20.5 vs 112.2 ± 39.1 mg; P < 0.001). The pain scores were significantly lower in the Propacetamol group measured at two intervals of the study, although visual analog scale pain intensity scores were smaller than 3 in both groups. Most patients in the Placebo group obtained a greater degree of sedation on postoperative Day 3 (P < 0.05). This study demonstrates the usefulness of propacetamol as an adjunct to PCA morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain after spinal fusion.

Implications: We evaluated the utility of propacetamol as an adjunct to the administration of patient-controlled analgesia morphine in the treatment of postoperative pain after spine stabilization surgery. This combination was associated with an appropriate analgesic effect and with a smaller morphine consumption.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
The Changing Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S5 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
I. Power
Recent advances in postoperative pain therapy
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2005; 95(1): 43 - 51.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. L. Moller, G. I. Juhl, C. Payen-Champenois, and L. A. Skoglund
Intravenous Acetaminophen (Paracetamol): Comparable Analgesic Efficacy, but Better Local Safety than Its Prodrug, Propacetamol, for Postoperative Pain After Third Molar Surgery
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 90 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
C. Remy, E. Marret, and F. Bonnet
Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 505 - 513.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. K. Herbert, R. Weis, P. Holzer, and N. Roewer
Peristalsis in the Guinea Pig Small Intestine In Vitro Is Impaired by Acetaminophen but Not Aspirin and Dipyrone
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 120 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Stockler, J. Vardy, A. Pillai, and D. Warr
Acetaminophen (Paracetamol) Improves Pain and Well-Being in People With Advanced Cancer Already Receiving a Strong Opioid Regimen: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Cross-Over Trial
J. Clin. Oncol., August 15, 2004; 22(16): 3389 - 3394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Van Aken, L. Thys, L. Veekman, and H. Buerkle
Assessing Analgesia in Single and Repeated Administrations of Propacetamol for Postoperative Pain: Comparison with Morphine After Dental Surgery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 159 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Lahtinen, H. Kokki, H. Hendolin, T. Hakala, and M. Hynynen
Propacetamol as Adjunctive Treatment for Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2002; 95(4): 813 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. C. Crews
Multimodal Pain Management Strategies for Office-Based and Ambulatory Procedures
JAMA, August 7, 2002; 288(5): 629 - 632.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.