JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Graziano, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samra, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Graziano, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Neuroanesthesia
Right arrow Monitoring (Non-cardiac)
Anesth Analg 2001;92:1510-1515
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA

Remifentanil- and Fentanyl-Based Anesthesia for Intraoperative Monitoring of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Satwant K. Samra, MD*, Eric A. Dy, BS{dagger},*, Kathleen B. Welch, MS{dagger}, Lisa K. Lovely, REEGEPT{ddagger}, and Gregory P. Graziano, MD§

Departments of *Anesthesiology, {dagger}Biostatistics, {ddagger}Neurology, and §Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Satwant K. Samra, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1H247UH, Box 0048, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Address e-mail to satsam{at}umich.edu

We sought to compare effects of remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia on the morphology of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and speed of recovery from anesthesia. Forty-one patients undergoing spinal surgery and requiring intraoperative monitoring of SSEPs were randomized into two groups. In Group 1, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with fentanyl, 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and 0.5%–0.75% isoflurane. In Group 2, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with remifentanil, 50% oxygen in air, and 0.5%–0.75% isoflurane. The variables compared included hemodynamic changes during the induction and intubation, the interval from the end of anesthesia to extubation, intraoperative blood loss and fluid administration, and changes in latency and amplitude of the P37–N45 component of posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the N20–P24 component of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. The two groups were matched for demographics, ASA physical status, and duration of surgery. Hemodynamic profiles after the induction and intubation were similar. There were significant differences between groups in time intervals from the end of anesthesia to extubation (15.3 ± 12.8 vs 5.3 ± 2.3 min; P = 0.0001) and ability to follow verbal commands (14.6 ± 11.9 vs 4.5 ± 2.4 min; P = 0.0001), with the Remifentanil group showing earlier recovery. Variability (coefficient of variation) of P37–N45 latency was greater (0.026 vs 0.014; P = 0.001) in the Fentanyl group.

Implications: Both fentanyl- and remifentanil-based anesthesia are well suited for intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials monitoring. Remifentanil anesthesia offers the advantage of earlier recovery, which may improve the ability to do a wake-up test if it is needed during surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. Hermanns, P. Lipfert, S. Meier, M. Jetzek-Zader, R. Krauspe, and M. F. Stevens
Cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials during spine surgery in patients with neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis under propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2007; 98(3): 362 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. J. Clapcich, R. G. Emerson, D. P. Roye Jr., H. Xie, E. J. Gallo, K. C. Dowling, B. Ramnath, and E. J. Heyer
The Effects of Propofol, Small-Dose Isoflurane, and Nitrous Oxide on Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Bispectral Index Monitoring in Adolescents Undergoing Spinal Fusion
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1334 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. A. Raw, J. K. Beattie, and J. M. Hunter
Anaesthesia for spinal surgery in adults
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2003; 91(6): 886 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. G. Logginidou, B.-H. Li, D.-P. Li, J. S. Lohmann, H. G. Schuler, N. A. DiVittore, S. Kreiser, and A. J. Cronin
Propofol Suppresses the Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential in Rats
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1784 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B.-H. Li, J. S. Lohmann, H. G. Schuler, and A. J. Cronin
Preservation of the Cortical Somatosensory-Evoked Potential During Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Rats
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1155 - 1160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.