Anesth Analg 2001;92:1510-1515
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society
NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIA
Remifentanil- and Fentanyl-Based Anesthesia for Intraoperative Monitoring of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials
Satwant K. Samra, MD*,
Eric A. Dy, BS ,*,
Kathleen B. Welch, MS ,
Lisa K. Lovely, REEGEPT , and
Gregory P. Graziano, MD
Departments of *Anesthesiology, Biostatistics, Neurology, and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Satwant K. Samra, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1H247UH, Box 0048, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Address e-mail to satsam{at}umich.edu
We sought to compare effects of remifentanil- and fentanyl-based anesthesia on the morphology of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and speed of recovery from anesthesia. Forty-one patients undergoing spinal surgery and requiring intraoperative monitoring of SSEPs were randomized into two groups. In Group 1, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with fentanyl, 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen, and 0.5%0.75% isoflurane. In Group 2, anesthesia was induced with sodium thiopental and maintained with remifentanil, 50% oxygen in air, and 0.5%0.75% isoflurane. The variables compared included hemodynamic changes during the induction and intubation, the interval from the end of anesthesia to extubation, intraoperative blood loss and fluid administration, and changes in latency and amplitude of the P37N45 component of posterior tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials and the N20P24 component of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials. The two groups were matched for demographics, ASA physical status, and duration of surgery. Hemodynamic profiles after the induction and intubation were similar. There were significant differences between groups in time intervals from the end of anesthesia to extubation (15.3 ± 12.8 vs 5.3 ± 2.3 min; P = 0.0001) and ability to follow verbal commands (14.6 ± 11.9 vs 4.5 ± 2.4 min; P = 0.0001), with the Remifentanil group showing earlier recovery. Variability (coefficient of variation) of P37N45 latency was greater (0.026 vs 0.014; P = 0.001) in the Fentanyl group.
Implications: Both fentanyl- and remifentanil-based anesthesia are well suited for intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials monitoring. Remifentanil anesthesia offers the advantage of earlier recovery, which may improve the ability to do a wake-up test if it is needed during surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Hermanns, P. Lipfert, S. Meier, M. Jetzek-Zader, R. Krauspe, and M. F. Stevens
Cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials during spine surgery in patients with neuromuscular and idiopathic scoliosis under propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth.,
March 1, 2007;
98(3):
362 - 365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Clapcich, R. G. Emerson, D. P. Roye Jr., H. Xie, E. J. Gallo, K. C. Dowling, B. Ramnath, and E. J. Heyer
The Effects of Propofol, Small-Dose Isoflurane, and Nitrous Oxide on Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential and Bispectral Index Monitoring in Adolescents Undergoing Spinal Fusion
Anesth. Analg.,
November 1, 2004;
99(5):
1334 - 1340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Raw, J. K. Beattie, and J. M. Hunter
Anaesthesia for spinal surgery in adults
Br. J. Anaesth.,
December 1, 2003;
91(6):
886 - 904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. G. Logginidou, B.-H. Li, D.-P. Li, J. S. Lohmann, H. G. Schuler, N. A. DiVittore, S. Kreiser, and A. J. Cronin
Propofol Suppresses the Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential in Rats
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2003;
97(6):
1784 - 1788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B.-H. Li, J. S. Lohmann, H. G. Schuler, and A. J. Cronin
Preservation of the Cortical Somatosensory-Evoked Potential During Dexmedetomidine Infusion in Rats
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2003;
96(4):
1155 - 1160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|