JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Leveno, K. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Pain
Anesth Analg 2001;92:1524-1528
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

Intensity of Labor Pain and Cesarean Delivery

James M. Alexander, MD*, Shiv K. Sharma, MD{dagger}, Donald D. McIntire, PhD*, Jackie Wiley, RN{dagger}, and Kenneth J. Leveno, MD*

Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and {dagger}Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Address correspondence and reprint requests to James M. Alexander, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9032. Address e-mail to jalexa{at}mednet .swmed.edu.

Some authors have suggested that the intensity of labor pain may be related to labor dystocia. We performed a secondary analysis of a previously published randomized investigation of the effects of epidural analgesia during labor compared with patient-controlled IV meperidine on cesarean delivery. Two-hundred-fifty-nine women who received patient-controlled IV meperidine were identified for analysis. All women were in spontaneous labor with a singleton, term gestation. Women requiring 50 mg or more of meperidine per hour during labor were compared with those who required <50 mg/h. In addition, their pain scores (visual analog scale) were compared before and after analgesia administration. Pain scores were significantly higher in women requiring 50 mg/h of meperidine (8.7 vs 8.0, P = 0.05), and their labors tended to be longer (9 vs 5 h, P = 0.09). More cesarean deliveries for obstructed labor were performed in women requiring >50 mg/h of meperidine (14% vs 1.4%, P = 0.001). Neonatal outcomes were similar in the two groups.

Implications: More intense pain during labor, as evidenced by increased self-administered analgesia, is a marker of obstructed labor and the need for cesarean delivery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. A. Wong, B. M. Scavone, A. M. Peaceman, R. J. McCarthy, J. T. Sullivan, N. T. Diaz, E. Yaghmour, R-J. L. Marcus, S. S. Sherwani, M. T. Sproviero, et al.
The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor
N. Engl. J. Med., February 17, 2005; 352(7): 655 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Camann
Pain Relief during Labor
N. Engl. J. Med., February 17, 2005; 352(7): 718 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
H. K. Eltzschig, E. S. Lieberman, and W. R. Camann
Regional Anesthesia and Analgesia for Labor and Delivery
N. Engl. J. Med., January 23, 2003; 348(4): 319 - 332.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.