JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Feiner, J. R. Articles by Hickey, R. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Feiner, J. R. Articles by Hickey, R. F. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research

---

ECONOMICS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

Productivity Versus Availability as a Measure of Faculty Clinical Responsibility

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Address correspondence to Dr. Miller, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Box 0648, University of California San Francisco, 521 Parnassus, C455, San Francisco, CA 94143–0648.

Faculty clinical time is an extremely valuable commodity. Most departments quantify faculty clinical time on an "availability" basis (e.g., number of days in the operating room or nights on call). We hypothesize that a productivity measure (i.e., determination of actual clinical care delivered rather than availability of such care) would produce different results than the availability system. The "billable hour" was chosen as the measurement device. It was defined as time that anesthesia was actually given, as obtained from the anesthetic record. After collecting data for a year, we found that despite parity using the availability system, the billable hour system detected significant differences between faculty within and between groups. We conclude that "availability" and "productivity" systems produce different conclusions regarding the relative contributions of an individual faculty or subspecialty group.

IMPLICATIONS: Accountability of clinical activities by faculty is crucial to the financial status of any department of anesthesia. We hypothesized that methods of availability (e.g., amount of time scheduled for clinical activities) versus productivity measure (actual amount of clinical care delivered) would be quite different between faculty and differing subspecialty groups. Even though the availability system distributed clinical time on an equal basis, there was a wide difference of clinical productivity within and between specialty groups. We conclude that a productivity measure (i.e., billable hours) is a more accurate reflection of faculty productivity than an availability system and is more in line with departmental sources of financial income.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Masursky, F. Dexter, M. P. Garver, and N. A. Nussmeier Incentive Payments to Academic Anesthesiologists for Late Afternoon Work Did Not Influence Turnover Times Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2009; 108(5): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Abouleish Productivity-Based Compensations Versus Incentive Plans Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1765 - 1767. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Reich, M. Galati, M. Krol, C. A. Bodian, and R. A. Kahn A Mission-Based Productivity Compensation Model for an Academic Anesthesiology Department Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2008; 107(6): 1981 - 1988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Abouleish, D. S. Prough, and D. A. Lubarsky Unintended consequences? Unanswered questions? Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1908 - 1909. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. K. Tremper, A. Shanks, and M. Morris Trends in the Financial Status of United States Anesthesiology Training Programs: 2000 to 2004 Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Miller and N. H. Cohen The Impact of Productivity-Based Incentives on Faculty Salary-Based Compensation Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 195 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Miller Academic Anesthesia Faculty Salaries: Incentives, Availability, and Productivity Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 487 - 489. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Abouleish, J. L. Apfelbaum, D. S. Prough, J. P. Williams, J. A. Roskoph, W. E. Johnston, and C. W. Whitten The Prevalence and Characteristics of Incentive Plans for Clinical Productivity Among Academic Anesthesiology Programs Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 493 - 501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. R. Freund and K. L. Posner Sustained Increases in Productivity with Maintenance of Quality in an Academic Anesthesia Practice Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1104 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. W. Whitten, J. Feiner, R. D. Miller, and R. Hickey Clinical Productivity Metrics * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 763 - 763. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999