Anesth Analg 2001;93:482-487
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
The Analgesic Efficacy of Patient-Controlled Bupivacaine Wound Instillation After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy with Bilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy
Edna Zohar, MD,
Brian Fredman, MB, BCh,
Alex Phillipov, MD,
Robert Jedeikin, BSc, MB, ChB, FFA(SA), and
Arie Shapiro, MD
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel; and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Robert Jedeikin, BSc, MB, ChB, FFA(SA), Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba 44281, Israel.
To assess the effect of local anesthetic wound instillation on visceral and somatic pain, we studied 36 patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. A standard general anesthetic was administered. On completion of the operation, a multiorifice 20-gauge epidural catheter was placed above the superficial abdominal fascia such that the tip was at the midpoint of the surgical wound. After surgery, either bupivacaine 0.25% (Bupivacaine group) or sterile water (Control group) was administered via a patient-controlled analgesia device programmed to deliver 9.0 mL with a 60-min lockout interval. During the first 6 h after surgery, rescue IV morphine (2 mg) was administered every 10 min until a visual analog scale score of <30 mm was achieved. Thereafter, on patient request, rescue meperidine 1 mg/kg IM was administered. When compared with the Control group, significantly (P < 0.001) less rescue analgesia was administered to patients in the Bupivacaine group. Rescue morphine administered during the first 6 h after surgery was 6 ± 4 mg versus 12 ± 6 mg (P < 0.001) for the Bupivacaine and Control groups, respectively. Rescue meperidine administered was 29 ± 37 mg versus 95 ± 36 mg (P < 0.001) for the Bupivacaine and Control groups, respectively. Nausea and antiemetic drug administration was significantly (P = 0.003) less in the Bupivacaine group. Pain scores were similar between the groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly (P = 0.04) more in the Bupivacaine group. We conclude that bupivacaine wound instillation decreases opioid requirements and nausea in the first 24 h after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
IMPLICATIONS: Bupivacaine instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device provides effective analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. C. Hafizoglu, K. Katircioglu, M. Y. Ozkalkanli, and S. Savaci
Bupivacaine Infusion Above or Below the Fascia for Postoperative Pain Treatment After Abdominal Hysterectomy
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2008;
107(6):
2068 - 2072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gupta, A. Perniola, K. Axelsson, S. E. Thorn, K. Crafoord, and N. Rawal
Postoperative Pain After Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Double-Blind Comparison Between Placebo and Local Anesthetic Infused Intraperitoneally
Anesth. Analg.,
October 1, 2004;
99(4):
1173 - 1179.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Parker and R. Charbonneau
Large Area Local Anesthesia (LALA) in Submuscular Breast Augmentation
Aesthetic Surgery Journal,
September 1, 2004;
24(5):
436 - 441.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Ng, A. Swami, G. Smith, A.C. Davidson, and J. Emembolu
The Analgesic Effects of Intraperitoneal and Incisional Bupivacaine with Epinephrine After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2002;
95(1):
158 - 162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|