This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (25) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ng, A. Articles by Smith, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ng, A. Articles by Smith, G. Related Collections Obstetrics Ambulatory

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

Gastroesophageal Reflux and Aspiration of Gastric Contents in Anesthetic Practice

University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, England

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Graham Smith, MD, FRCA, University Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester LE1 5WW, England. Address e-mail to anae{at}le.ac.uk

General anesthesia may predispose patients to aspiration of gastroesophageal contents because of depression of protective reflexes during loss of consciousness. In addition, some patients may be at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration because of retention of gastric contents caused by pain, inadequate starvation, or gastrointestinal pathology resulting in reduced gastric emptying and gastroesophageal reflux. Despite increasing knowledge of the problems associated with aspiration, the relatively small incidence and associated mortality rates in the perioperative period do not appear to have changed markedly over the last few decades. In this review article, the physiological factors associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration are considered together with some of the methods that are used to prevent aspiration. In particular, preoperative starvation, the use of drugs designed to increase gastric pH, recent developments in airway devices, and appropriate application of cricoid pressure are critically appraised.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Rice, A. A. Mancuso, C. Gibbs, T. E. Morey, N. Gravenstein, and L. A. Deitte Cricoid Pressure Results in Compression of the Postcricoid Hypopharynx: The Esophageal Position Is Irrelevant Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1546 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Pawlik, T. Schubert, S. Hopf, M. Lubnow, M. Gruber, C. Selig, K. Taeger, and K. P. Ittner The Effects of Fenoterol Inhalation After Acid Aspiration-Induced Lung Injury Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2009; 109(1): 143 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Karmarkar and S. Varshney Tracheal extubation CEACCP, December 1, 2008; 8(6): 214 - 220. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Kohjitani, M. Funahashi, T. Miyawaki, M. Hanazaki, R. Matsuo, and M. Shimada Peripheral N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptors Modulate Nonadrenergic Noncholinergic Lower Esophageal Sphincter Relaxation in Rabbits Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1681 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-C. Jeske, J. Borovicka, A. von Goedecke, C. Meyenberger, T. Heidegger, and A. Benzer The Influence of Postural Changes on Gastroesophageal Reflux and Barrier Pressure in Nonfasting Individuals Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2005; 101(2): 597 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Thorn, S.-E. Thorn, and M. Wattwil The Effects of Cricoid Pressure, Remifentanil, and Propofol on Esophageal Motility and the Lower Esophageal Sphincter Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2005; 100(4): 1200 - 1203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Brock-Utne, A. Ng, and G. Smith Gastroesophageal Reflux and Aspiration of Gastric Contents * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 762 - 763. [Full Text] [PDF]