JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ngan Kee, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ngan Kee, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, F. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Anesth Analg 2001;93:703-708
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

Metaraminol Infusion for Maintenance of Arterial Blood Pressure During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: The Effect of a Crystalloid Bolus

Warwick D. Ngan Kee, MBChB, MD, FANZCA, Kim S. Khaw, MBBS, FRCA, Bee B. Lee, MBBS, FANZCA, Mabel M.S Wong, RN, BHS(Nurs), and Floria F. Ng, RN, BASc

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China

Address correspondence to Dr Ngan Kee, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, China. Address e-mail to warwick{at}cuhk.edu.hk

We randomly allocated women having elective cesarean delivery to receive either no bolus (Control Group, n = 31) or 20 mL/kg lactated Ringer’s solution (Bolus Group, n = 35) IV before spinal anesthesia. An infusion of metaraminol started at 0.25 mg/min was titrated to maintain systolic arterial blood pressure in the target range 90%–100% of baseline. The total dose of metaraminol required up to the time of uterine incision was similar between the Control Group and the Bolus Group (3.62 ± 1.20 vs 3.27 ± 1.39 mg, P = 0.3). However, the Control Group required more metaraminol in the first 5 min (1.29 ± 0.60 vs 0.96 ± 0.58 mg, P = 0.025) and a faster maximum infusion rate (0.45 ± 0.20 vs 0.32 ± 0.13 mg/min, P = 0.002) compared with the Bolus Group. There was no difference between groups in regards to changes in systolic arterial blood pressure or heart rate over time, or maternal or neonatal outcome. We conclude that when metaraminol is used to maintain arterial pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery, crystalloid bolus is not essential provided that sufficient vasopressor is given in the immediate postspinal period.

IMPLICATIONS: In patients receiving spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery, when arterial pressure was maintained using an IV infusion of metaraminol, crystalloid bolus reduced the early vasopressor requirement but had no effect on overall vasopressor requirement or maternal or neonatal outcome.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Siddik-Sayyid, V. G. Nasr, S. K. Taha, R. A. Zbeide, J.-M. A. Shehade, A. A. Al Alami, F. H. Mokadem, F. W. Abdallah, A. S. Baraka, and M. T. Aouad
A Randomized Trial Comparing Colloid Preload to Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2009; 109(4): 1219 - 1224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. W. Y. Lee, K. S. Khaw, W. D. Ngan Kee, and T. Y. Leung
Management of hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2009; 103(3): 457 - 458.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, K. S. Khaw, F. F. Ng, M. K. Karmakar, L. A. Critchley, and T. Gin
A Prospective Comparison of Vasopressor Requirement and Hemodynamic Changes During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Patients with Multiple Gestation Versus Singleton Pregnancy
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 407 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. Erkinaro, K. Makikallio, T. Kavasmaa, S. Alahuhta, and J. Rasanen
Effects of ephedrine and phenylephrine on uterine and placental circulations and fetal outcome following fetal hypoxaemia and epidural-induced hypotension in a sheep model
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2004; 93(6): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
W. D. Ngan Kee, K. S. Khaw, and F. F. Ng
Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2004; 92(4): 469 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. D. Ngan Kee, K. S. Khaw, F. F. Ng, and B. B. Lee
Prophylactic Phenylephrine Infusion for Preventing Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 815 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, and T. Gin
A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Intravenous Ephedrine for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 483 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. S. Khaw, W. D. Ngan Kee, M. Wong, F. Ng, and A. Lee
Spinal Ropivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Hyperbaric and Plain Solutions
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2002; 94(3): 680 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
W. D. N. Kee, K. S. Khaw, B. B. Lee, F. F. Ng, and M. M. S. Wong
Randomized controlled study of colloid preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2001; 87(5): 772 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.