JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopacz, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, H. W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:755-760
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

A Comparison of Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.5% With or Without Epinephrine for Lumbar Spine Surgery

Dan J. Kopacz, MD*, James D. Helman, MD*, Charles E. Nussbaum, MD{dagger}, John N. K. Hsiang, MD, PhD{dagger}, Peter C. Nora, MD{dagger}, and Hugh W. Allen, MD*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Address correspondence to Dan J. Kopacz, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Mailstop B2-AN, Seattle, WA 98111. Address e-mail to anedjk{at}vmmc.org

Levobupivacaine, the S(-) isomer of bupivacaine, is less cardiotoxic than racemic bupivacaine. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study of epidural anesthesia, we compared the onset, extent, and duration of sensory and motor blockade produced by plain 0.5% levobupivacaine (15 mL, 75 mg) with that of 0.5% levobupivacaine with the addition of 1:400,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine in 117 patients undergoing elective spine surgery. The time to onset of adequate sensory block (T10 dermatome) was similar in all groups (12.4 ± 6.6 min for plain levobupivacaine, 13.9 ± 7.9 min for levobupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine, and 12.7 ± 4.9 min for levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine), with an average peak block height of T5. Time to complete regression of sensory blockade was also similar between groups (357 ± 119 min for plain levobupivacaine, 378 ± 98 min for levobupivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine, and 348 ± 80 min for levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine). Peak serum levobupivacaine levels were reduced in each of the epinephrine-containing groups. We conclude that 0.5% levobupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 or 1:400,000 epinephrine produced effective epidural anesthesia in patients having lumbar spine surgery. Epinephrine 1:400,000 is as effective as 1:200,000 in reducing the resultant serum levobupivacaine levels after epidural anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS: The addition of epinephrine 1:400,000 or 1:200,000 to epidural 0.5% levobupivacaine reduces the resultant serum levobupivacaine levels without altering the duration of sensory blockade. All solutions were well tolerated and effective in producing epidural anesthesia for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. A. Visser, R. A. Lee, and M. J. M. Gielen
Factors Affecting the Distribution of Neural Blockade by Local Anesthetics in Epidural Anesthesia and a Comparison of Lumbar Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 708 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Ratajczak-Enselme, J.-P. Estebe, F.-X. Rose, E. Wodey, J.-M. Malinovsky, F. Chevanne, G. Dollo, C. Ecoffey, and P. Le Corre
Effect of epinephrine on epidural, intrathecal, and plasma pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep
Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 881 - 890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
F. M. Soetens, M. A. Soetens, and M. P. Vercauteren
Levobupivacaine-sufentanil with or without epinephrine during epidural labor analgesia.
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 182 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. G. Costello, J. R. Cormack, L. E. Mather, B. LaFerlita, M. A. Murphy, and K. Harris
Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following scalp block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 848 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. J. Newton, G. A. McLeod, F. Khan, and J. J. F. Belch
Vasoactive characteristics of bupivacaine and levobupivacaine with and without adjuvant epinephrine in peripheral human skin
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2005; 94(5): 662 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. B. McDonald, E. Jacobsohn, D. J. Kopacz, S. Desphande, J. D. Helman, F. Salinas, and R. A. Hall
Parasternal Block and Local Anesthetic Infiltration with Levobupivacaine After Cardiac Surgery with Desflurane: The Effect on Postoperative Pain, Pulmonary Function, and Tracheal Extubation Times
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. D. Tobias
A Review of Intrathecal and Epidural Analgesia After Spinal Surgery in Children
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 956 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. B. Lee
A Misleading Conclusion and Abstract
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 629 - 629.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.