| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


*Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; and
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and
Department of Anesthesia, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Leena Mildh, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, PO BOX 281, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland. Address e-mail to leena.mildh{at}hus.fi
The relative potencies of fentanyl and alfentanil for respiratory depression were determined in eight healthy male volunteers in a double-blinded, randomized study with a cross-over design. The drugs were delivered by computer-driven infusion with logarithmically ascending plasma concentrations until the respiratory rate reached 2/min and/or oxygen saturation decreased below 85% with subjects breathing room air. Ventilation was measured with respiratory inductive plethysmography, indirect calorimetry, and arterial blood gas analysis, and plasma drug concentrations were determined. Pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using a fractional Emax model for minute volume and respiratory rate and the concentrations producing 50% depression (i.e., apparent 50% effective concentration [EC50] values) were determined. Both drugs decreased ventilation in a similar manner, and drug infusions were terminated at mean ± SD measured plasma concentrations of 254 ± 88 ng/mL and 5.1 ± 1.7 ng/mL for alfentanil and fentanyl, respectively. Alfentanil decreased minute volume from baseline by 54% ± 19% and respiratory rate by 40% ± 11% with EC50 values of 234 ± 57 ng/mL and 195 ± 101 ng/mL. The respective decreases for fentanyl were 50% ± 11%, 41% ± 15%, and the estimated EC50 values were 6.1 ± 1.4 ng/mL and 3.5 ± 1.4 ng/mL, respectively. Using the apparent EC50 values, the calculated potency ratio for alfentanil:fentanyl was (mean and 95% confidence interval) 1:39 (1:311:46) for minute volume and 1:51 (1:341:68) for respiratory rate. This is analogous to the analgesic effect studied earlier. The findings support the notion of parallel analgesic and respiratory depressant effects of alfentanil and fentanyl. Therefore equianalgesic concentrations of both drugs will lead to equally pronounced respiratory depression.
IMPLICATIONS: This double-blinded, randomized study evaluated the potency ratio of alfentanil and fentanyl-induced respiratory depression. The findings support the notion of parallel analgesic and respiratory depressant effects of alfentanil and fentanyl. Therefore equianalgesic concentrations of both drugs will lead to equally pronounced respiratory depression.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Dahan, A. Yassen, H. Bijl, R. Romberg, E. Sarton, L. Teppema, E. Olofsen, and M. Danhof Comparison of the respiratory effects of intravenous buprenorphine and fentanyl in humans and rats Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 825 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lahtinen, H. Kokki, T. Hakala, and M. Hynynen S(+)-Ketamine as an Analgesic Adjunct Reduces Opioid Consumption After Cardiac Surgery Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1295 - 1301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dahan and L. J. Teppema Influence of anaesthesia and analgesia on the control of breathing Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 40 - 49. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Iwakiri, O. Nagata, T. Matsukawa, M. Ozaki, and D. I. Sessler Effect-Site Concentration of Propofol for Recovery of Consciousness Is Virtually Independent of Fentanyl Effect-Site Concentration Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1651 - 1655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|