JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ortolani, O.
Right arrow Articles by Novelli, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ortolani, O.
Right arrow Articles by Novelli, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postanesthetic Care Unit
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1222-1226
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Recovery of Senegalese African Blacks from Intravenous Anesthesia with Propofol and Remifentanil Is Slower Than That of Caucasians

Oreste Ortolani, MD*, Anna Conti, BSci{dagger}, Bineta Sall/Ka, MD{ddagger}, Jean Pierre Salleras, MD{ddagger}, Elisabeth Diouf, MD{ddagger}, Ohmar Kane, MD{ddagger}, Stephen J. Roberts, ESci§, and Gian Paolo Novelli, MD*

*Universita’ di Firenze, Dipartimento di Area Critica Medico Chirurgica, Firenze, Italy; {dagger}Universita’ di Napoli "Federico II," Dipartimento di Patologia e Biologia Molecolare e Cellulare, Napoli, Italy; {ddagger}Universite’ de Dakar, Service de Anestesie et Reanimation C.H.U. Le Dantec, Dakar, Senegal; and §Oxford University, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford, United Kingdom

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Oreste Ortolani, Via Carducci, 42 80121 Naples, Italy. Address e-mail to o.ortolani{at}dfc.unifi.it

Differences in sensitivity to anesthetic drugs have already been described among races. This study was designed to comparatively investigate the anesthetic requirements of two different ethnic groups: Caucasians and African blacks. Forty-five Caucasians from Italy and 45 African blacks from Senegal, who underwent general IV anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil, were comparatively evaluated for anesthetic depth and time lapsed before recovery. We used an electroencephalographic-derived index of depth of anesthesia, the bispectral index (BIS), and evaluation of clinical variables to assess the depth of anesthesia and the recovery trend. Mean BIS values from Caucasians after propofol dis- continuation returned to baseline (92–100) in approximately 8 min, whereas in African blacks BIS values remained <80 for some 30 min. Time to eye opening was 10.6 ± 4.8 min in Caucasians versus 16.9 ± 8.8 min in African blacks (P < 0.001). Time to respond to loud verbal commands was 14.8 ± 9.1 min in African blacks versus 9.1 ± 4.2 min in Caucasians (P < 0.01). During anesthetic induction, the mean arterial pressure decreased by 20% in Caucasians and by only 10% in African blacks. We conclude that the recovery from general anesthesia with propofol was slower in African blacks compared with Caucasian patients.

IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates statistically significant differences between Caucasians and African blacks in the arousal time from IV anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. The authors conclude that the recovery from general anesthesia was slower in African blacks compared with Caucasian patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. M. Ayoub, L. B. Rizk, C. I. Yaacoub, D. Gaal, and Z. N. Kain
Music and Ambient Operating Room Noise in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1316 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.