Anesth Analg 2001;93:1227-1232
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
A Comparison of Patient-Controlled Sedation Using Either Remifentanil or Remifentanil-Propofol for Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Hwan S. Joo, MD FRCPC*,
William J. Perks, Phm ,
Mark T. Kataoka, MD FRCPC*,
Lee Errett, MD FRCSC ,
Kenneth Pace, MD FRCSC , and
R. John Honey, MD FRCSC
Departments of *Anaesthesia and Pharmacy, Divisions of Cardiac Surgery and Urology, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Address correspondence to Hwan Joo, MD, Department of Anaesthesia, St. Michaels Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond St., Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 1W8. Address e-mail to hwanjoom{at}yahoo.com
Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) has been used for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) because it allows for rapid individualized titration of anesthetics. Because of its sedating effects, the addition of propofol to remifentanil may improve patient tolerance of SWL with PCS. One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil 10 µg or remifentanil 10 µg plus propofol 5 mg for PCS with zero-lockout interval. Nine patients in the Remifentanil group and three patients in the Remifentanil-Propofol group required additional sedatives to complete their SWL (P = 0.128). Compared with the Remifentanil group, the Remifentanil-Propofol group required less remifentanil, had a decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and had a better overall satisfaction level. However, they had an increased incidence of transient apnea and oxygen desaturation. The incidence of apnea was 15% in the Remifentanil group and 52% in the Remifentanil-Propofol group (P < 0.001). All patients were able to move themselves to the stretcher at the end of SWL, and median time to home discharge was <70 min in both groups. Both remifentanil and remifentanil-propofol were useful for PCS during SWL.
IMPLICATIONS: The addition of propofol to remifentanil improves patient satisfaction and decreases postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, it causes more respiratory depression than remifentanil alone. When remifentanil-propofol is used with patient-controlled sedation, appropriate monitoring and a minimum 12 min lockout interval is required.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. T. Moerman, L. L. Herregods, M. M. De Vos, E. P. Mortier, and M. M. R. F. Struys
Manual Versus Target-Controlled Infusion Remifentanil Administration in Spontaneously Breathing Patients
Anesth. Analg.,
March 1, 2009;
108(3):
828 - 834.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. J. Medina, E. M. Galvin, M. Dirckx, P. Banwarie, J. F. H. Ubben, F. J. Zijlstra, J. Klein, and S. J. C. Verbrugge
Remifentanil as a Single Drug for Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Comparison of Infusion Doses in Terms of Analgesic Potency and Side Effects
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2005;
101(2):
365 - 370.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Van de Velde, D. Van Schoubroeck, L. E. Lewi, M. A.E. Marcus, J. C. Jani, C. Missant, A. Teunkens, and J. A. Deprest
Remifentanil for Fetal Immobilization and Maternal Sedation During Fetoscopic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison with Diazepam
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2005;
101(1):
251 - 258.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mallick, S. Elliot, T. D. Egan, and S. E. Kern
Remifentanil is too potent to be given by bolus
Br. J. Anaesth.,
August 1, 2004;
93(2):
305 - 306.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Burmeister, T. G. Standl, M. Wintruff, P. Brauer, I. Blanc, and J. Schulte am Esch
Dolasetron prophylaxis reduces nausea and postanaesthesia recovery time after remifentanil infusion during monitored anaesthesia care for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Br. J. Anaesth.,
February 1, 2003;
90(2):
194 - 198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|