JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kopman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, G. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kopman, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Neuman, G. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1253-1236
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Precurarization and Priming: A Theoretical Analysis of Safety and Timing

Aaron F. Kopman, MD, Nabeel A. Khan, MD, and George G. Neuman, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Saint Vincents Hospital & Medical Center of New York, New York, New York

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Aaron F. Kopman, MD, Department of Anesthesiology (Room NR 408), St. Vincents Hospital & Medical Center, 170 W. 12th St., New York City, NY 10011. Address e-mail to akopman{at}rcn.com

The priming principle suggests that the onset of neuromuscular block may be accelerated if an intubating dose is preceded by a priming dose administered a few minutes earlier. We thought it would be instructive to use a pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic model to estimate the risk associated with different priming doses and intervals. In any normal population, there is wide variability in the response to neuromuscular blocking drugs. For most relaxants, the coefficient of variation for the 50% effective dose (ED50) approximates 20%–25%. Thus, 1 patient in 50 (-2.05 SD) may have an ED50 only half of the commonly cited value. By using published pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic data, we calculated the effect of administering 10%, 20%, or 30% of the ED95 on the response of the adductor pollicis muscle in a population normally distributed with respect to drug sensitivity. A dose equivalent to 10% of the ED95 will rarely produce a measurable neuromuscular effect. As this dose is increased, the potential for clinical weakness rapidly escalates. In 1 in 50 individuals, the usual recommendation of 10% of the intubation dose will produce measurable neuromuscular depression. For vecuronium, the optimal priming interval is 5 min. The safety and dependability of the priming principle is very much subject to the laws of probability.

IMPLICATIONS: When using the priming principle to accelerate the onset of neuromuscular block, the initial dose should not exceed 10% the drug’s ED95. For drugs other than rocuronium, the optimal priming interval is not <5 min.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Bock, L. Haselmann, B. W. Bottiger, and J. Motsch
Priming with rocuronium accelerates neuromuscular block in children: a prospective randomized study: [L'amorcage avec le rocuronium accelere le bloc neuromusculaire chez les enfants : une etude prospective randomisee]
Can J Anesth, July 1, 2007; 54(7): 538 - 543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Schmidt, A. Irouschek, T. Muenster, T. M. Hemmerling, and S. Albrecht
A priming technique accelerates onset of neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles: [Une technique d'amorcage accelere le blocage neuromusculaire au niveau des muscles adducteurs du larynx]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2005; 52(1): 50 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
T. Mencke, C. Becker, J. U. Schreiber, and T. Fuchs-Buder
A longer pretreatment interval does not improve cisatracurium precurarization
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2002; 49(6): 640 - 641.
[Full Text]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.