JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Subramaniam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sennaraj, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Subramaniam, B.
Right arrow Articles by Sennaraj, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1321-1326
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Preoperative Epidural Ketamine in Combination with Morphine Does Not Have a Clinically Relevant Intra- and Postoperative Opioid-Sparing Effect

Balachundhar Subramaniam, MD*, Kathirvel Subramaniam, MD*, Dilip K. Pawar, MBBS MD, MNAMS{dagger}, and B. Sennaraj, MD{dagger}

*Department of AnesthesiologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Balachundhar Subramaniam, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215. Address e-mail to chundhar_{at}hotmail.com This work was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

In this prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of preincisional administration of epidural ketamine with morphine compared with epidural morphine alone for postoperative pain relief after major upper-abdominal surgery. We studied 50 ASA I and II patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures. These patients were randomly allocated to one of the two treatment groups: patients in Group 1 received epidural morphine 50 µg/kg, whereas those in Group 2 received epidural ketamine 1 mg/kg combined with 50 µg/kg of morphine 30 min before incision. Intraoperative analgesia was provided in addition, with IV morphine, and the requirement was noted. A blinded observer using a visual analog scale for pain assessment observed patients for 48 h after surgery. Additional doses of epidural morphine were provided when the visual analog scale score was more than 4. Analgesic requirements and side effects were compared between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, weight, or duration or type of the surgical procedures. The intraoperative morphine requirement was significantly (P = 0.018) less in Group 2 patients (median, 6.8 mg; range, 3–15 mg) compared with patients in Group 1 (median, 8.3 mg; range, 4.5–15 mg). The time for the first requirement of analgesia was significantly (P = 0.021) longer (median, 17 h; range, 10–48 h) in Group 2 patients than in Group 1 (median, 12 h; range, 4–36 h). The total number of supplemental doses of epidural morphine required in the first 48 h after surgery was comparable (P = 0.1977) in both groups. Sedation scores were similar in both groups. One patient in Group 2 developed hallucinations after study drug administration. None of the patients in either group developed respiratory depression. Other side effects, such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting, were also similar in both groups. Although the addition of ketamine had synergistic analgesic effects with morphine (reduced intraoperative morphine consumption and prolonged time for first requirement of analgesia), there was no long- lasting preemptive benefit seen with this combination (in terms of reduction in supplemental analgesia) for patients undergoing major upper-abdominal procedures.

IMPLICATIONS: Ketamine added to epidural morphine given before surgery can decrease postoperative pain by its preemptive effect, opioid potentiation, and prevention of acute opioid tolerance. A single epidural bolus of 1 mg/kg of ketamine with morphine given before major upper-abdominal surgery did not result in a clinically relevant reduction in postoperative pain relief.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. S. Ozyalcin, A. Yucel, H. Camlica, N. Dereli, O. K. Andersen, and L. Arendt-Nielsen
Effect of pre-emptive ketamine on sensory changes and postoperative pain after thoracotomy: comparison of epidural and intramuscular routes
Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2004; 93(3): 356 - 361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Subramaniam, B. Subramaniam, and R. A. Steinbrook
Ketamine as Adjuvant Analgesic to Opioids: A Quantitative and Qualitative Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 482 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. J. L. McCartney, A. Sinha, and J. Katz
A Qualitative Systematic Review of the Role of N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists in Preventive Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1385 - 1400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.