JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gamulin, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1327-1331
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Epinephrine Does Not Prolong the Analgesia of 20 mL Ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% in a Femoral Three-In-One Block

Anne Weber, MD*, Roxane Fournier, MD*, Elisabeth Van Gessel, MD*, Nicolas Riand, MD{dagger}, and Zdravko Gamulin, MD*

*Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgical Intensive Care, and {dagger}Clinic of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals, Geneva , Switzerland

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Anne Weber, Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgical Intensive Care, University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. Address e-mail to Anne.Weber{at}hcuge.ch

We tested the effect of epinephrine added to 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.2% on postoperative analgesia via a femoral catheter after total knee replacement. Forty-one patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined peripheral block/general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. After insertion of a femoral catheter, 21 patients in the Ropivacaine-Epinephrine (ROPI-EPI) group received 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000, whereas 20 patients in the Ropivacaine group (ROPI) received 20 mL plain ropivacaine 0.5%. Thereafter, a sciatic block with 30 mL bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 was performed in all patients, followed by general anesthesia. After surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with ropivacaine 0.2% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 for Group ROPI-EPI and plain ropivacaine 0.2% for Group ROPI was available via the femoral catheter (200 mL ropivacaine 0.2% ± epinephrine, bolus 20 mL, lockout 120 min). The patients were instructed to use PCA when the knee pain score was >3 cm. The interval between the initial ropivacaine injection and the first PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% ± epinephrine, whereas the interval between the first and second PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.2% ± epinephrine. The average duration of ropivacaine 0.5% was 657 ± 345 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 718 ± 423 min for the ROPI group (NS), whereas for ropivacaine 0.2%, the average duration was 409 ± 245 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 419 ± 339 min for the ROPI group (not significant). We conclude that epinephrine does not influence the duration of analgesia of the ropivacaine concentrations investigated.

IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the effect of epinephrine on the duration of analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% injected in femoral three-in-one block for pain relief after total knee replacement. Our results show that epinephrine does not alter the duration of analgesia of the two solutions investigated.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.