JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mouren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Coriat, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mouren, S.
Right arrow Articles by Coriat, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1402-1409
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIA

The Continuous Recording of Blood Pressure in Patients Undergoing Carotid Surgery Under Remifentanil Versus Sufentanil Analgesia

Stéphane Mouren, MD PhD*, Gaertrud De Winter, MD{dagger}, Sandra P. Guerrero, MD{dagger}, Christophe Baillard, MD{dagger}, Michèle Bertrand, MD{dagger}, and Pierre Coriat, MD{dagger}

*Département Bloc-Anesthésie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; and {dagger}Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France

Address correspondence to Stéphane Mouren, MD, PhD, Département Bloc-Anesthésie, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75674 Paris Cedex 14, France.

We compared the hemodynamic stability during carotid endarterectomy of remifentanil with that of sufentanil anesthesia. Fifty-six patients were randomly assigned into Remifentanil (n = 27) or Sufentanil (n = 29) groups. In the Remifentanil group, IV propacetamol (2 g) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) were infused 30 min before skin closure. In the Sufentanil group, patients received 2 g propacetamol. Beat-to-beat recordings of systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) were stored on a computer. The maximum and minimum values of BP and HR after induction, at intubation, during the surgical procedure, and after the operation and the coefficients of variation of SBP and HR were used as indices of hemodynamic stability. The coefficients of variation of SBP and HR were similar in both groups during and after surgery. However, at intubation, maximal SBP was higher in the Sufentanil group (P < 0.05). Decreased propofol doses and isoflurane end-tidal concentrations were used in the Remifentanil group. At recovery, a similar profile of SBP and HR was found in both groups. We conclude that intra- and posthemodynamic stability was similar with remifentanil or sufentanil in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. However, remifentanil was more effective for blunting the increase in SBP at intubation without increasing the blood pressure-decreasing effect of induction. Intraoperative remifentanil use was associated with a decreased amount of hypnotic drug administered.

IMPLICATIONS:Beat-to-beat recordings of heart rate and blood pressure in patients undergoing carotid surgery revealed that hemodynamic stability was similar with remifentanil or sufentanil anesthesia both during and after surgery. Remifentanil was more effective in limiting the increase in blood pressure associated with intubation without increasing the blood pressure-lowering effect of induction or the blood pressure response to recovery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Bekker, M. Sturaitis, M. Bloom, M. Moric, J. Golfinos, E. Parker, R. Babu, and A. Pitti
The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Perioperative Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1340 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Ahonen, R. Jokela, K. Uutela, and M. Huiku
Surgical stress index reflects surgical stress in gynaecological laparoscopic day-case surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2007; 98(4): 456 - 461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. D. Stoneham
Editorial I: 'It ain't what you do; it's the way that you do it ...': reducing haemodynamic instability during carotid surgery
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 321 - 323.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
G. Godet, M. Reina, M. Raux, J. Amour, V. De Castro, and P. Coriat
Anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of hypnotic- and opioid-based techniques{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. De Castro, G. Godet, G. Mencia, M. Raux, and P. Coriat
Target-Controlled Infusion for Remifentanil in Vascular Patients Improves Hemodynamics and Decreases Remifentanil Requirement
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.