JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lefrant, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Eledjam, J.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lefrant, J.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Eledjam, J.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2001;93:1598-1605
© 2001 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

The Comparative Electrophysiologic and Hemodynamic Effects of a Large Dose of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine in Anesthetized and Ventilated Piglets

Jean-Yves Lefrant, MD PhD*, Jean E. de La Coussaye, MD PhD*, Jacques Ripart, MD PhD*, Laurent Muller, MD MSc*, Laurent Lalourcey, MD MSc*, Pascale A. Peray, MD PhD{dagger}, X. Mazoit, MD PhD{ddagger}, Antoine Sassine, MD§, and Jean-Jacques Eledjam, MD*

Departments of *Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Emergency, and the {dagger}Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University-Hospital of Nîmes, France; {ddagger}Laboratoire d’Anesthésie, UPRES EA 392, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Sud, Kremlin Bicêtre, Bicêtre, France; and §the Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Physiology, Medical School of Montpellier-Nîmes, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professeur Jean E. de La Coussaye, Département d’Urgences-Réanimation, CHU Nîmes, 5 Rue Hoche, 30029 Nîmes, Cedex 4, France.

Ropivacaine is less potent and less toxic than bupivacaine. We administered these two local anesthetics in a cardiac electrophysiologic model of sodium thiopental-anesthetized and ventilated piglets. After assessing the stability of the model, bupivacaine (4 mg/kg) and ropivacaine (6 mg/kg) were given IV in two groups (n = 7) of piglets. No alteration in biological variables was reported throughout the study. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine similarly decreased mean aortic pressure from 99 ± 22 to 49 ± 31 mm Hg and from 87 ± 17 to 58 ± 28 mm Hg, respectively, and decreased the peak of the first derivative of left ventricular pressure from 1979 ± 95 to 689 ± 482 mm Hg/s and from 1963 ± 92 to 744 ± 403 mm Hg/s, respectively. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was similarly increased from 6 ± 5 to 9 ± 5 mm Hg and from 6 ± 4 to 12 ± 4 mm Hg, respectively. Bupivacaine and ropivacaine similarly lengthened the cardiac cycle length (R-R; from 479 ± 139 to 706 ± 228 ms and from 451 ± 87 to 666 ± 194 ms, respectively), atria His (from 71 ± 15 to 113 ± 53 ms and from 64 ± 6 to 86 ± 10 ms, respectively), and QTc (QTc = QT x R-R-0.5, Bazett formula; from 380 ± 71 to 502 ± 86 ms and from 361 ± 33 to 440 ± 56 ms, respectively) intervals. Bupivacaine altered to a greater extent the PQ (the onset of the P wave to the Q wave of the QRS complex) (from 97 ± 20 to 211 ± 60 ms versus from 91 ± 8 to 145 ± 38 ms, P < 0.05), QRS (from 58 ± 3 to 149 ± 34 ms versus from 60 ± 5 to 101 ± 17 ms, P < 0.05), and His ventricle interval (from 25 ± 4 to 105 ± 30 ms vs from 25 ± 4 to 60 ± 30 ms, P < 0.05) than ropivacaine. A 6 mg/kg ropivacaine dose induced similar hemodynamic alterations as 4 mg/kg bupivacaine. However, bupivacaine altered the variables of ventricular conduction (QRS and His ventricle) to a greater extent.

IMPLICATIONS: A 6 mg/kg ropivacaine dose induced similar hemodynamic alterations as 4 mg/kg bupivacaine. However, bupivacaine altered the variables of ventricular conduction (QRS and His ventricle) to a greater extent.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. E. Copeland, L. A. Ladd, X.-Q. Gu, and L. E. Mather
The Effects of General Anesthesia on the Central Nervous and Cardiovascular System Toxicity of Local Anesthetics
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1429 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. N. Stehr, T. Christ, B. Rasche, S. Rasche, E. Wettwer, A. Deussen, U. Ravens, T. Koch, and M. Hubler
The Effects of Levosimendan on Myocardial Function in Ropivacaine Toxicity in Isolated Guinea Pig Heart Preparations
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 641 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
V. D. Mayr, C. Raedler, V. Wenzel, K. H. Lindner, and H.-U. Strohmenger
A Comparison of Epinephrine and Vasopressin in a Porcine Model of Cardiac Arrest After Rapid Intravenous Injection of Bupivacaine
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1426 - 1431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Weinberg, C. Paisanthasan, D. Feinstein, and W. Hoffman
The Effect of Bupivacaine on Myocardial Tissue Hypoxia and Acidosis During Ventricular Fibrillation
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 790 - 795.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2001 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.