JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Labaille, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benhamou, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Labaille, T.
Right arrow Articles by Benhamou, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2002;94:100-105
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

The Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics of Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Thierry Labaille, MD*, Jean Xavier Mazoit, MD PhD{dagger}, Xavier Paqueron, MD*, Dominique Franco, MD{ddagger}, and Dan Benhamou, MD*{dagger}

Departments of *Anesthesia and Intensive Care and {ddagger}Surgery, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France; and {dagger}Laboratory of Experimental Anesthesia, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Bicêtre, France

Address correspondence to Dan Benhamou, MD, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, BP 405, 92141 Clamart, France. Address e-mail to dan.benhamou{at}bct.ap-hop-paris.fr Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is less than after laparotomy, and patients may benefit from an intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetic. Thirty-seven ASA physical status I or II patients received in double-blinded fashion 20 mL of 0.9% saline solution (placebo), ropivacaine 0.25% (Rop 0.25%), or ropivacaine 0.75% (Rop 0.75%) immediately after trocar placement and at the end of surgery. We measured pain and morphine consumption until 20 h after surgery. Plasma ropivacaine concentrations were measured. The three groups were comparable for shoulder pain, parietal pain, and incidence of side effects. Visceral pain at rest, during cough, and on movement and total consumption of morphine were significantly smaller in Groups Rop 0.25% and Rop 0.75% when compared with Placebo. Although no adverse effect occurred in any patient, the largest dose led to large plasma concentrations of ropivacaine (2.93 ± 2.46 µg/mL and 3.76 ± 3.01 µg/mL after the first and second injection, respectively). We conclude that intraperitoneal administration of ropivacaine before and after surgery significantly decreases postoperative pain. Because the smaller dosage (2 x 50 mg) provided similar analgesia and was associated with significantly smaller plasma concentrations than the larger dosage (2 x 150 mg), this smaller dosage seems more appropriate.

IMPLICATIONS: Intraperitoneal ropivacaine 100 mg injected during laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly decreased postoperative pain when compared with injection of intraperitoneal placebo. At this dose, plasma concentrations remained in the nontoxic range,




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. Paech, K. F. Ilett, L. P. Hackett, M. Page-Sharp, and R. W. Parsons
Disposition and Clinical Outcome After Intraperitoneal Meperidine and Ropivacaine Administration During Laparoscopic Surgery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 278 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. P. Boddy, S. Mehta, and M. Rhodes
The effect of intraperitoneal local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2006; 103(3): 682 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Ng and G. Smith
Editorial I: Intraperitoneal administration of analgesia: is this practice of any utility?
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2002; 89(4): 535 - 537.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.