JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by D’Angelo, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owen, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by D’Angelo, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Anesth Analg 2002;94:179-183
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

Ropivacaine 0.075% and Bupivacaine 0.075% with Fentanyl 2 µg/mL are Equivalent for Labor Epidural Analgesia

Medge D. Owen, MD, John A. Thomas, MD, Trevor Smith, MD, Lynn C. Harris, RN, and Robert D’Angelo, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Section of Obstetric Anesthesia, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Owen, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1009. Address e-mail to mowen{at}wfubmc.edu

Fifty percent effective dose estimates for ropivacaine and bupivacaine suggest that ropivacaine is 40% less potent than bupivacaine to initiate labor analgesia. At clinically used concentrations, however, the drugs seem indistinguishable for initiating and maintaining labor analgesia. We designed this study to evaluate a concentration near the reported 50% effective dose values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine in an attempt to detect differences between the drugs during routine clinical use. Fifty-nine nulliparous women in labor were randomized to receive 0.075% ropivacaine or bupivacaine, each with fentanyl 2 µg/mL. After epidural placement and the administration of a lidocaine/epinephrine test dose, 20 mL of study solution was administered and a patient-controlled epidural infusion was initiated with the following settings: 6 mL/h basal rate, 5 mL bolus, 10 min lockout, and 30 mL/h limit. Breakthrough pain was treated with 10-mL boluses of study solution. By using a study design to detect a 40% difference in hourly drug use between groups, we found no statistically significant differences in the amount of local anesthetic used, verbal pain scores, sensory levels, motor blockade, labor duration, mode of delivery, side effects, or patient satisfaction. We conclude that 0.075% ropivacaine and bupivacaine, with fentanyl, are equally effective for labor analgesia using the patient-controlled epidural analgesia technique.

IMPLICATIONS: At small concentrations, ropivacaine and bupivacaine when combined with fentanyl are equally effective for labor analgesia. Patients self-administered similar volumes of 0.075% ropivacaine or bupivacaine solutions containing fentanyl (2 µg/mL) suggesting that at this concentration, and with the addition of fentanyl, ropivacaine and bupivacaine can be used interchangeably.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern and B. Carvalho
Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia for Labor
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2009; 108(3): 921 - 928.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. B. Lee, W. D. Ngan Kee, F. F. Ng, T. K. Lau, and E. L. Y. Wong
Epidural Infusions of Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Obstetric Outcome
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2004; 98(4): 1145 - 1152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris
Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. Lim, C. E. Ocampo, and A. T. Sia
A Comparison of Duration of Analgesia of Intrathecal 2.5 mg of Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, and Levobupivacaine in Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia for Patients in Labor
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 235 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-M. Bernard, D. Le Roux, and J. Frouin
Ropivacaine and Fentanyl Concentrations in Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor: A Volume-Range Study
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2003; 97(6): 1800 - 1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
L. S. Polley and M. O. Columb
Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine: Concentrating on Dosing!
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1251 - 1253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. H. Halpern and V. Walsh
Epidural Ropivacaine Versus Bupivacaine for Labor: A Meta-Analysis
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1473 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Boselli, R. Debon, F. Duflo, B. Bryssine, B. Allaouchiche, and D. Chassard
Ropivacaine 0.15% Plus Sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g/mL and Ropivacaine 0.10% Plus Sufentanil 0.5 {micro}g/mL Are Equivalent for Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labor
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1173 - 1177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.