| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Department of Anesthesiology, Childrens National Medical Center and George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Susan T. Verghese, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Childrens National Medical Center, 111 Michigan Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20010. Address e-mail to sverghes{at}cnmc.org
We calculated the effects of the simulated Valsalva (V), liver (L) compression, and Trendelenburg (T) position on the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the right internal jugular vein by using planimetry (Aloka® ultrasound machine) in 84 infants and young children. Eight combinations of positions and interventions were studied for each patient, with the patient supine, in the T position, during the simulated V maneuver, with L compression and a combination of maneuvers. Data were analyzed by using Friedmans
2 test and Wilcoxons signed rank test. An increase of >25% in the CSA of the internal jugular vein was considered significant. In infants, the maximal mean increase achieved with the combination of all 3 maneuvers was only 17.4% ± 16.1%. As a single maneuver, the simulated V was the most effective (11.6% ± 11.5%). In children, the combination of all 3 maneuvers performed simultaneously produced a mean 65.9% (SD ± 44.7%) increase in the CSA, which was larger than the increase by all other maneuvers alone or in a single combination (Friedmans test, P < 0.001 and Wilcoxons test, P < 0.002). As a single maneuver, V produced the most increase (40.4% ± 32.2%) compared with L compression (14.3% ± 18.9%) or T position (24.3% ± 27.1%).
IMPLICATIONS: The combinations of simulated Valsalva, liver compression, and Trendelenburg maneuvers produce the maximal mean increase in the size of the internal jugular vein in infants and young children, with the Valsalva maneuver being the most effective single maneuver. This increase is significant in young children, but negligible in infants.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Yuki, K. Chilson, K. C. Odegard, and J. A. DiNardo Trendelenburg Position, Simulated Valsalva Maneuver, and Liver Compression Do Not Alter the Size of the Right Internal Jugular Vein in Patients with a Bidirectional Glenn Shunt Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 365 - 368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Clenaghan, R E McLaughlin, C Martyn, S McGovern, and J Bowra Relationship between Trendelenburg tilt and internal jugular vein diameter Emerg. Med. J., December 1, 2005; 22(12): 867 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Schreiber, U. K. W. Lambert, F. Doepp, and J. M. Valdueza Effects of prolonged head-down tilt on internal jugular vein cross-sectional area Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2002; 89(5): 769 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|