JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lennox, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G. W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lennox, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, G. W. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2002;94:346-350
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Small-Dose Selective Spinal Anesthesia for Short-Duration Outpatient Laparoscopy: Recovery Characteristics Compared with Desflurane Anesthesia

Pamela H. Lennox, MB, BAO, BCh, MRCPI, FCARCSI*, Himat Vaghadia, BSc, MBBS, MHSc, FRCPC, FFARCS*{dagger}, Cynthia Henderson, MD, FRCPC*, Lynn Martin, MD, FRCPC*, and G. W. E. Mitchell, MB, BCh, FRCOG, FRCS (Ed), FRCSC{ddagger}

Departments of *Anesthesia, {dagger}Health Care and Epidemiology, and {ddagger}Gynecology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Himat Vaghadia, Department of Anesthesia, JPP 2449, Vancouver General Hospital, 855 West 12th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada V5Z 1M9. Address e-mail to hvaghadi{at}vanhosp.bc.ca

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the recovery characteristics of selective spinal anesthesia (SSA) and desflurane anesthesia (DES) in outpatient gynecological laparoscopy. Twenty ASA physical status I patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopy were randomized to receive either SSA with lidocaine 10 mg + sufentanil 10 µg or general anesthesia with DES and N2O. Intraoperative conditions, recovery times, postanesthesia recovery scores, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Intraoperative conditions were comparable in both groups. All patients in the SSA group were awake and oriented at the end of surgery, whereas patients in the DES group required 7 ± 2 min for extubation and orientation. SSA patients had a significantly shorter time to straight leg raising (3 ± 1 min versus 9 ± 4 min; P < 0.0001) and to ambulation (3 ± 0.9 min versus 59 ± 16 min; P < 0.0001) compared with the DES group. SSA patients had significantly less postoperative pain than DES patients (P < 0.05). We concluded that SSA was an effec-tive alternative to DES for outpatient gynecological laparoscopy.

IMPLICATIONS: This study compared the use of a desflurane general anesthetic to a small-dose spinal anesthetic in ambulatory gynecological laparoscopy. Using the spinal technique, patients can walk from the operating room table to a stretcher on completion of surgery. Their recovery time was similar to that of the desflurane group.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. de Santiago, J. Santos-Yglesias, J. Giron, F. Montes de Oca, A. Jimenez, and P. Diaz
Low-Dose 3 mg Levobupivacaine Plus 10 {micro}g Fentanyl Selective Spinal Anesthesia for Gynecological Outpatient Laparoscopy
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1456 - 1461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Liu, W. M. Strodtbeck, J. M. Richman, and C. L. Wu
A Comparison of Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1634 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A.-M. Korhonen, J. V. Valanne, R. M. Jokela, P. Ravaska, and K. T. Korttila
A Comparison of Selective Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine and General Anesthesia with Desflurane for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2004; 99(6): 1668 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Silvanto, P. Tarkkila, M.-L. Makela, and P. H. Rosenberg
The Influence of Ambulation Time on the Incidence of Transient Neurologic Symptoms After Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 642 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.