JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terheggen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terheggen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Knape, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Ambulatory
Anesth Analg 2002;94:355-359
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society

AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Paravertebral Blockade for Minor Breast Surgery

Michel A. Terheggen, MD*{ddagger}, Frank Wille, MD{dagger}{ddagger}, Inne H. Borel Rinkes, MD, PhD§, Trian I. Ionescu, MD, PhD{ddagger}, and Johannes T. Knape, MD, PhD{ddagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; {dagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht/Zeist, The Netherlands; {ddagger}Division for Perioperative Care, Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands; and §Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Michel A. M. B. Terheggen, Department of Anesthesiology, Ziekenhuis Rijnstate, Postbus 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, the Netherlands. Address e-mail to mterhegg{at}euronet.nl

Paravertebral blockade (PVB) has been advocated as a useful technique for breast surgery. We prospectively compared the efficacy of PVB via a catheter technique with the efficacy of general anesthesia (GA) for minor breast surgery. Thirty patients were randomized into two groups to receive either PVB or GA. Variables of efficacy were postoperative pain measured on a visual analog scale, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery time, and patient satisfaction. Postoperative visual analog scale scores in the PVB group were significantly lower in the early postoperative period (maximum, 12 vs 45 mm; P < 0.01). In both groups, PONV was nearly absent. There was no difference in recovery time. Patient satisfaction was better in the PVB group (2.8 vs 2.3; scale, 0–3; P < 0.01). There was one inadvertent epidural block and one inadvertent pleural puncture in the PVB group. Although PVB resulted in better postoperative pain relief, the advantages over GA were marginal in this patient group because postoperative pain was relatively mild and the incidence of PONV was small. Considering that the technique has a certain complication rate, we conclude that at present the risk/benefit ratio of PVB does not favor routine use for minor breast surgery.

IMPLICATIONS: This study confirms the previously reported superior pain relief after paravertebral blockade (PVB) for breast surgery. However, considering the relatively mild postoperative pain and therefore the limited advantage of PVB for these patients, the risk/benefit ratio does not favor the routine use of PVB for minor breast surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White
Choice of peripheral nerve block for inguinal herniorrhaphy: is better the enemy of good?
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2006; 102(4): 1073 - 1075.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. S. Liu, W. M. Strodtbeck, J. M. Richman, and C. L. Wu
A Comparison of Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Ambulatory Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1634 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Klein, H. Evans, K. C. Nielsen, M. S. Tucker, D. S. Warner, and S. M. Steele
Peripheral Nerve Block Techniques for Ambulatory Surgery
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1663 - 1676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
J. Richardson
Paravertebral anesthesia and analgesia
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2004; 51(suppl_1): R3 - R3.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Lemay, J. Guay, C. Cote, M. C. Boivin, and F. Varin
The number of injections does not influence local anesthetic absorption after paravertebral blockade: [Le nombre d'injections n'influence pas l'absorption d'un anesthesique local apres un bloc paravertebral]
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2003; 50(6): 562 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.