JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (11) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Murdoch, J. A. C. Articles by Scott, N. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Murdoch, J. A. C. Articles by Scott, N. B. Related Collections Regional Anesthesia Pain

---

REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

The Efficacy and Safety of Three Concentrations of Levobupivacaine Administered as a Continuous Epidural Infusion in Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery

John A. C. Murdoch, FRCA^*, Ursula K. Dickson, FRCA, Paul A. Wilson, FRCA, Jonathan S. Berman, FRCA, Rita R. Gad-Elrab, FFARCSI, and Nicholas B. Scott, FRCA^*

*Department of Anaesthesia, HCI International Medical Centre, Clydebank, Scotland; Department of Anaesthesia, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland; and Department of Anaesthesia, Royal National Orthopedic Hospital, Stanmore, England

Address correspondence and reprint requests to John A. C. Murdoch, Specialist Registrar in Anesthesia, South Glasgow University Hospitals, Victoria Infirmary, Langside Road, Glasgow, G42 9TV, Scotland, UK. Address e-mail to john-murdoch{at}btinternet.com

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of three concentrations of levobupivacaine infused epidurally as analgesia for patients undergoing orthopedic procedures. Patients undergoing elective hip or knee joint replacement were enrolled in the study (n = 105). Sensory blockade was established preoperatively with 10–15 mL of 0.75% levobupivacaine. Patients were then randomized to receive 0.0625%, 0.125%, or 0.25% levobupivacaine as a continuous epidural infusion at 6 mL/h for 24 h. IV morphine patient-controlled analgesia was given as rescue analgesia, and time to first request for analgesia and total dose of morphine consumed were recorded. Sensory blockade, motor blockade, visual analog scale pain score, and cardiovascular variables were also recorded at regular intervals postoperatively. Ninety-one patients were included in the primary intent-to-treat analysis. Total normalized dose of morphine, number of patient-controlled analgesia requests, and overall postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower for the 0.25% group compared with the other two groups, and the time to first request for rescue analgesia was longer. There was no significant difference between the 0.125% and 0.25% groups in terms of maximum motor blockade achieved and time to minimal motor blockade. Safety data were equivalent among the three groups. We conclude that levobupivacaine as a continuous epidural infusion provided adequate postoperative analgesia and that the 0.25% concentration provided significantly longer analgesia than 0.125% or 0.0625% levobupivacaine without any significant increase in detectable motor blockade relative to the 0.125% group.

IMPLICATIONS: Postoperative epidural infusion of levobupivacaine can provide safe and effective analgesia for patients having hip or knee joint replacement. Of the three concentrations we infused at a constant rate, 0.25% provided significantly better pain relief.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Mendola, D. Ferrante, E. Oldani, G. Cammarota, G. Cecci, R. Vaschetto, and F. Della Corte Thoracic epidural analgesia in post-thoracotomy patients: comparison of three different concentrations of levobupivacaine and sufentanil Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2009; 102(3): 418 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. A. Visser, R. A. Lee, and M. J. M. Gielen Factors Affecting the Distribution of Neural Blockade by Local Anesthetics in Epidural Anesthesia and a Comparison of Lumbar Versus Thoracic Epidural Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2008; 107(2): 708 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Gupta, A. Perniola, K. Axelsson, S. E. Thorn, K. Crafoord, and N. Rawal Postoperative Pain After Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Double-Blind Comparison Between Placebo and Local Anesthetic Infused Intraperitoneally Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2004; 99(4): 1173 - 1179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Casati, F. Vinciguerra, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, C. Grispigni, M. Putzu, and P. Rivoltini Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison with 0.2% Ropivacaine Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 919 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Senard, A. Kaba, M. J. Jacquemin, L. M. Maquoi, M.-P. N. Geortay, P. D. Honore, M. L. Lamy, and J. L. Joris Epidural Levobupivacaine 0.1% or Ropivacaine 0.1% Combined with Morphine Provides Comparable Analgesia After Abdominal Surgery Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2004; 98(2): 389 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Dernedde, M. Stadler, F. Bardiau, and J. G. Boogaerts Continuous Epidural Infusion of Large Concentration/Small Volume Versus Small Concentration/Large Volume of Levobupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 796 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999