JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fredman, B.
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fredman, B.
Right arrow Articles by White, P. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ambulatory
Anesth Analg 2002;94:560-564
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Fast-Track Eligibility of Geriatric Patients Undergoing Short Urologic Surgery Procedures

Brian Fredman, MB BCh*, Offer Sheffer, MD*, Edna Zohar, MD*, Irena Paruta, MD*, Santiago Richter, MD{dagger}, Robert Jedeikin, BSc MB ChB, FFA(SA)*, and Paul F. White, PhD MD, FANZCA{ddagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and {dagger}Urology, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel, and the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; and the {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Brian Fredman, MB BCh, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba 44281, Israel. Address e-mail to bdfgls{at}netvision.net.il

Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of geriatric patients (>65 yr) bypassing the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after ambulatory surgery. A secondary objective was to compare recovery profiles when using three different maintenance anesthetics. Ninety ASA physical status I–III consenting outpatients (>65 yr) undergoing short urologic procedures were randomly assigned to one of three anesthetic treatment groups. After a standardized induction with fentanyl and propofol, anesthesia was maintained with propofol (75–150 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV), isoflurane (0.7%–1.2% end tidal), or desflurane (3%–6% end tidal), in combination with nitrous oxide 70% in oxygen. In all three groups, the primary anesthetic was titrated to maintain an electroencephalographic-bispectral index value of 60–65. Recovery times, postanesthesia recovery scores, and therapeutic interventions in the PACU were recorded. Although emergence times were similar in the three groups, the time to achieve a fast-track discharge score of 14 was significantly shorter in patients receiving desflurane compared with propofol and isoflurane (22 ± 23 vs 33 ± 25 and 44 ± 36 min, respectively). On arrival in the PACU, a significantly larger percentage of patients receiving desflurane were judged to be fast-track eligible compared with those receiving either isoflurane and propofol (73% vs 43% and 44%, respectively). The number of therapeutic interventions in the PACU was also significantly larger in the Isoflurane group when compared with the Propofol and Desflurane groups (21 vs 11 and 7, respectively). In conclusion, use of desflurane for maintenance of anesthesia should facilitate PACU bypass ("fast-tracking") of geriatric patients undergoing short urologic procedures.

IMPLICATIONS: Geriatric outpatients undergoing brief urologic procedures more rapidly achieve fast-tracking discharge criteria after desflurane (versus isoflurane and propofol) anesthesia. Use of isoflurane was also associated with an increased need for nursing interventions in the early recovery period compared with desflurane and propofol.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, H. Kehlet, J. M. Neal, T. Schricker, D. B. Carr, F. Carli, and the Fast-Track Surgery Study Group
The Role of the Anesthesiologist in Fast-Track Surgery: From Multimodal Analgesia to Perioperative Medical Care
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2007; 104(6): 1380 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SURG INNOVHome page
A. R. Seim, B. Andersen, D. L. Berger, S. M. Sokal, and W. S. Sandberg
The Effect of Direct-From-Recovery Room Discharge of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Patients on Recovery Room Workload
Surgical Innovation, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 257 - 264.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Zohar, I. Luban, P. F. White, E. Ramati, S. Shabat, and B. Fredman
Bispectral index monitoring does not improve early recovery of geriatric outpatients undergoing brief surgical procedures: [Le monitorage avec l'index bispectral n'ameliore pas la recuperation precoce des patients ambulatoires ages apres une operation breve]
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2006; 53(1): 20 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. F. White
Update on ambulatory anesthesia
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2005; 52(suppl_1): R10 - R10.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. Basgul, S. B. Akinci, and P. F. White
Cognitive Failures After General Anesthesia Are Probably Not Related to the Type of Anesthetic Used * Response
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1669 - 1669.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.