| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


*Department of Anesthesiology, St Savas Hospital, Athens;
Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieion Hospital, Athens; and
Medical School, University of Ioannina
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Argyro Fassoulaki, Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieion Hospital, 57-59 Raftopoulou St., 11744 Athens, Greece. Address e-mail to afassou1{at}otenet.gr
In this double-blinded study, we investigated the effect of physostigmine on sevoflurane anesthesia and recovery. Forty female patients scheduled for breast biopsy were randomly assigned to receive either physostigmine 2 mg IV or an equal volume of normal saline after skin closure. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen. After skin closure, a steady state of 0.6% inspired and end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was obtained, heart rate, blood pressure, and Bispectral index (BIS) baseline values were recorded, and physostigmine or normal saline was administered. Hemodynamics and BIS values were also recorded 5, 8, and 10 min after treatments. Anesthesia was discontinued, and orientation, sedation, sitting ability, and "picking up matches" scores were recorded immediately after extubation and 15 and 30 min later. No differences were found between the two groups in BIS (69, 70, 70, and 71 in the Physostigmine group versus 70, 74, 75, and 76 in the Control group) or blood pressure. Only heart rate was increased 8 min after physostigmine (P < 0.05 versus the control). Scores assessing early recovery were similar in the two groups at all time points. We conclude that physostigmine does not change BIS or enhance recovery after sevoflurane anesthesia.
IMPLICATIONS: This double-blinded, randomized study investigated the impact of physostigmine of BIS values during 0.6% sevoflurane anesthesia as well as in the postoperative recovery, when sevoflurane is administered as a sole anesthetic. Physostigmine has no effect on BIS values or on the tests assessing recovery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Fodale, L. B. Santamaria, S. B. Backman, and G. Plourde Different actions of sevoflurane and propofol on central nicotinic receptors may explain differences in hypnotic antagonism by cholinesterase inhibitors Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2004; 92(5): 773 - 775. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Plourde, D. Chartrand, P. Fiset, S. Font, and S. B. Backman Antagonism of sevoflurane anaesthesia by physostigmine: effects on the auditory steady-state response and bispectral index{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 583 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Fassoulaki, A. Paraskeva, K. Patris, T. Pourgiezi, and G. Kostopanagiotou Pressure Applied on the Extra 1 Acupuncture Point Reduces Bispectral Index Values and Stress in Volunteers Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 885 - 890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|