JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dutton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dutton, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Eger, E. I, II
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology
Anesth Analg 2002;94:631-639
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Short-Term Memory Resists the Depressant Effect of the Nonimmobilizer 1-2-Dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N) More than Long-Term Memory

Robert C. Dutton, MD*, Anya J. Maurer, BS*, James M. Sonner, MD*, Michael S. Fanselow, PhD{dagger}, Michael J. Laster, DVM*, and Edmond I Eger, II, MD*

*Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco; and {dagger}Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California

Address correspondence to Dr. Robert C. Dutton, Department of Anesthesia, S-455, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0464. Address e-mail to duttonr{at}anesthesia.ucsf.edu

The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane (2N, also termed F6) does not suppress movement to noxious stimuli but does suppress learning of fear-potentiated startle. The mechanism whereby 2N suppresses this learning is unknown. Herein, we report the effect of 2N on suppression of two other forms of learning, fear conditioning to context and to tone. Because 2N does not cause sedation, we could study the effect of 2N on short-term memory (memory for fear conditioning measured during or immediately after training) as well as on long-term memory (measured 24 h after training). The EC50 for suppression of long-term memory (the concentration decreasing memory by 50%) of fear conditioning to context was 2.00% ± 0.01% (mean ± SEM), and for fear conditioning to tone was 3.45% ± 0.26%, (P < 0.05). The EC50 for suppression of short-term memory of fear conditioning to context was 2.59% ± 0.21% (P < 0.05, compared with long-term memory of context conditioning), whereas short-term memory of fear conditioning to tone was not suppressed by 3.5%, the largest concentration studied. Thus, short-term memory resists the depressant effect of 2N more than long-term memory, fear conditioning to tone is less vulnerable to the effect of 2N than fear conditioning to context, and 3.5% 2N does not preclude transmission of tone and shock signals to the site where tone-shock associations are formed.

IMPLICATIONS: The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane has a greater depressant effect on long-term memory than short-term memory, suggesting that it impairs the processes responsible for the retention of memory more than for the formation of memory itself.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.