| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||


*Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria; and
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, Cairns, Australia
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Brimacombe, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia. Address e-mail to jbrimacombe{at}austarnet.com.au
We determined the efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM (PLMA) as a temporary ventilatory device in morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Sixty patients (body mass index 3560 kg/m2) scheduled for elective surgery, who preferred airway management under general anesthesia, were studied. The induction of anesthesia was with midazolam/fentanyl/propofol and maintenance was with sevoflurane 1%3% in oxygen 100%. The PLMA was inserted and an effective airway established. Rocuronium was given IV for paralysis. Oropharyngeal leak pressure, ease of gastric tube placement, residual gastric volume, fiberoptic position of the airway/drainage tube, and ease of ventilation at a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg was determined. The PLMA was then removed and laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation attempted. The number of insertion/intubation attempts (maximum two each) and time taken to establish an effective airway with each device were recorded. An effective airway was obtained at the first insertion attempt in 90% of patients (54/60) and at the second attempt in 10% (6/60). The time taken to provide an effective airway was 15 ± 7 s (742 s). Oropharyngeal leak pressure was 32 ± 8 cm H2O (1240 cm H2O). The residual gastric volume was 36 ± 46 mL (0240 mL). Positive pressure ventilation without air leaks was possible in 95% of patients (57/60). The vocal cords were seen from the airway tube in 75% of patients (45/60), but the esophagus was not seen. The fiberoptic view from the drainage tube revealed mucosa in 93% of patients (56/60) and an open upper esophageal sphincter in 7% (4/60). Tracheal intubation was successful at the first attempt in 90% of patients (54/60), at the second attempt in 7% (4/60), and failed in 3% (2/60). In these latter two patients, the PLMA was reinserted and surgery performed uneventfully with the PLMA. The time taken to tracheally intubate the patient was 13 ± 10 s (851 s). There were no episodes of hypoxia (SpO2 <90%) or other adverse events. There were no differences in insertion success rate, or the time to successful insertion between the PLMA and laryngoscope-guided intubation. We conclude that the PLMA is an effective temporary ventilatory device in grossly or morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation.
IMPLICATIONS: The laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM is an effective temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Eschertzhuber, J. Brimacombe, M. Hohlrieder, K.-H. Stadlbauer, and C. Keller Gum Elastic Bougie-Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Is Superior to the Digital and Introducer Tool Techniques in Patients with Simulated Difficult Laryngoscopy Using a Rigid Neck Collar Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Freo, M. Carron, M. Micaglio, and C. Ori ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparoscopic gastric banding in a myasthenic, morbidly obese patient Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2007; 99(6): 921 - 922. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. von Goedecke, H. Herff, P. Paal, V. Dorges, and V. Wenzel Field Airway Management Disasters Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2007; 104(3): 481 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brimacombe and C. Keller A Proposed Algorithm for the Management of Airway Obstruction with the ProsealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 298 - 299. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gaszynski and P. Juvin Standard Clinical Tests for Predicting Difficult Intubation Are Not Useful Among Morbidly Obese Patients * Response Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2004; 99(3): 956 - 956. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Keller, J. Brimacombe, P. Lirk, and F. Puhringer Failed Obstetric Tracheal Intubation and Postoperative Respiratory Support with the ProSealTM Laryngeal Mask Airway Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1467 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ovassapian, A. Norris, and D. Hinchliffe Management of failed intubation in a septic parturient Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 154 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Brodsky, H. J. M. Lemmens, J. G. Brock-Utne, L. J. Saidman, R. Levitan, B. O. Ogunnaike, S. B. Jones, C. W. Whitten, D. B. Jones, and D. Provost Anesthetic Considerations for Bariatric Surgery: Proper Positioning is Important for Laryngoscopy * Response Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2003; 96(6): 1841 - 1842. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|