JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (43)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Capdevila, X.
Right arrow Articles by d’Athis, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Capdevila, X.
Right arrow Articles by d’Athis, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain
Anesth Analg 2002;94:1001-1006
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Continuous Three-in-One Block for Postoperative Pain After Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgery: Where Do the Catheters Go?

Xavier Capdevila, MD, PhD, Philippe Biboulet, MD, Didier Morau, MD, Nathalie Bernard, MD, Jacques Deschodt, MD, Sandrine Lopez, MD, and Françoise d’Athis, MD

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Lapeyronie University Hospital, Montpellier, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Xavier Capdevila, MD, PhD, Département d’Anesthésie Réanimation A, Hôpital Lapeyronie, 371 Avenue du Doyen Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France. Address e-mail to x-capdevila{at}chu-montpellier.fr

Continuous three-in-one block is widely used for postoperative analgesia after proximal lower limb surgery, but location of the catheter has not been well addressed in the literature. We prospectively studied, in 100 patients, the characteristics of catheter threading under the iliac fascia and the correlations between catheter tip location and effective sensory and motor blockade of the three principal nerves of the lumbar plexus. Postoperatively, in conscious patients, 16 to 20 cm of a catheter was placed in the fascial sheath after femoral nerve location with a nerve stimulator. Contrast media (3 mL Iopamidol 390®) was injected, and the catheter tip was located by means of an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. An equal-volume mixture of 0.5% bupivacaine/2% lidocaine with epinephrine (30 mL) was injected through the catheter. Patient and catheter-insertion characteristics were noted. Thirty minutes after injection, sensory blockade was evaluated in the cutaneous territories of the lateral femoral cutaneous, femoral, and obturator nerves, along with motor blockade of the last two nerves. Pain scores at 30 min were also recorded. Seven block failures were noted. The tip of the catheter reached the lumbar plexus (Group 1) in 23% of the patients and lay deep to the medial (Group 2) or lateral (Group 3) part of the fascia iliaca in 33% and 37% of the patients, respectively. Demographic data and catheter threading characteristics were comparable among the groups. A three-in-one block was noted in 91% of Group 1 patients, but in only 52% and 27% of Group 2 and 3 patients, respectively (P < 0.05). Comparing Group 2 and 3 patients, sensory block was achieved in respectively 100% and 94% for the femoral nerve, 52% and 94% for the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (P < 0.05), and 82% and 27% for the obturator nerve (P < 0.05). Visual analog scale pain scores on movement were significantly lower in Group 1 patients (P < 0.05). We conclude that during a continuous three-in-one block, the threaded catheter rarely reached the lumbar plexus. The quality of sensory and motor blockade and initial pain relief depend on the location of the catheter tip under the fascia iliaca.

IMPLICATIONS: The course of a continuous three-in-one block catheter is unpredictable. Only 23% of the catheters lie near the lumbar plexus. The success of sensory and motor blocks, as well as postoperative analgesia, depend on the position of the catheter under the fascia iliaca.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Marino, J. Russo, M. Kenny, R. Herenstein, E. Livote, and J. E. Chelly
Continuous Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2009; 91(1): 29 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. J. Barrington, D. J. Olive, C. A. McCutcheon, C. Scarff, S. Said, R. Kluger, N. Gillett, and P. Choong
Stimulating Catheters for Continuous Femoral Nerve Blockade After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blinded Trial
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2008; 106(4): 1316 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
N. Valade, J. Ripart, E. Nouvellon, P. Cuvillon, D. Prat-Pradal, J.-Y. Lefrant, and J.-E. de La Coussaye
Does Sciatic Parasacral Injection Spread to the Obturator Nerve? An Anatomic Study
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 664 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. M. Hayek, R. M. Ritchey, D. Sessler, R. Helfand, S. Samuel, M. Xu, M. Beven, D. Bourdakos, W. Barsoum, and P. Brooks
Continuous Femoral Nerve Analgesia After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Stimulating Versus Nonstimulating Catheters
Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1565 - 1570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. J. van Geffen and M. Gielen
Ultrasound-guided subgluteal sciatic nerve blocks with stimulating catheters in children: a descriptive study.
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 328 - 33, table of contents.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
J. Birnbaum, T. Volk, N. Jack, E. Liem, and L. Vonhogen
Use of a stimulating catheter for femoral nerve block
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2006; 96(1): 139 - 140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Rodriguez, M. Taboada, J. Carceller, J. Lagunilla, M. Barcena, and J. Alvarez
Stimulating Popliteal Catheters for Postoperative Analgesia After Hallux Valgus Repair
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2006; 102(1): 258 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, G. Fanelli, Z. Koscielniak-Nielsen, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, G. Danelli, R. Fuzier, and F. Singelyn
Using Stimulating Catheters for Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block Shortens Onset Time of Surgical Block and Minimizes Postoperative Consumption of Pain Medication After Halux Valgus Repair as Compared with Conventional Nonstimulating Catheters
Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2005; 101(4): 1192 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. M. Morin, L. H. J. Eberhart, H. K. E. Behnke, S. Wagner, T. Koch, U. Wolf, W. Nau, C. Kill, G. Geldner, and H. Wulf
Does Femoral Nerve Catheter Placement with Stimulating Catheters Improve Effective Placement? A Randomized, Controlled, and Observer-Blinded Trial
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1503 - 1510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. R. Offerdahl, R. L. Lennon, and T. T. Horlocker
Successful Removal of a Knotted Fascia Iliaca Catheter: Principles of Patient Positioning for Peripheral Nerve Catheter Extraction
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1550 - 1552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. F. White, T. Issioui, G. D. Skrivanek, J. S. Early, and C. Wakefield
The Use of a Continuous Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block After Surgery Involving the Foot and Ankle: Does It Improve the Quality of Recovery?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2003; 97(5): 1303 - 1309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
X. Capdevila, P. Macaire, P. Aknin, C. Dadure, N. Bernard, and S. Lopez
Patient-Controlled Perineural Analgesia After Ambulatory Orthopedic Surgery: A Comparison of Electronic Versus Elastomeric Pumps
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2003; 96(2): 414 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.