JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erb, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Sugarman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erb, T. O.
Right arrow Articles by Sugarman, J.
Anesth Analg 2002;94:1155-1160
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

Permission and Assent for Clinical Research in Pediatric Anesthesia

Thomas O. Erb, MD MHS*, Scott R. Schulman, MD*, and Jeremy Sugarman, MD MPH, MA{dagger}

*Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and {dagger}Departments of Medicine and Philosophy and Center for the Study of Medical Ethics and Humanities, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Scott R. Schulman, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Box 3094, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to schul003{at}mc.duke.edu

IMPLICATIONS: This article discusses the process and specific nature of informed consent for clinical research in pediatric anesthesia. For informed consent to be meaningful, permission from the child’s proxy must be obtained and the child’s assent must be tailored in a manner that is sensitive to the abilities of children.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. R. Tait, T. Voepel-Lewis, and S. Malviya
Presenting Research Information to Children: A Tale of Two Methods
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2007; 105(2): 358 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
T. O'Lonergan and J. J. Zodrow
Pediatric Assent: Subject Protection Issues among Adolescent Females Enrolled in Research
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2006; 34(2): 451 - 459.
[PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. M. Simon, L. A. Siminoff, E. D. Kodish, and C. Burant
Comparison of the Informed Consent Process for Randomized Clinical Trials in Pediatric and Adult Oncology
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 22(13): 2708 - 2717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. H.T. Karlawish
Research Involving Cognitively Impaired Adults
N. Engl. J. Med., April 3, 2003; 348(14): 1389 - 1392.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. J. Denham and R. M. Nelson
Self-Determination Is Not an Appropriate Model for Understanding Parental Permission and Child Assent
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1049 - 1051.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.