Anesth Analg 2002;94:1212-1216
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
Target-Controlled Versus Manually-Controlled Infusion of Propofol for Direct Laryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy
Sylvie Passot, MD*,
Frédérique Servin, MD ,
René Allary, MD*,
Jean Pascal, MD*,
Jean-Michel Prades, MD PhD ,
Christian Auboyer, MD*, and
Serge Molliex, MD PhD*
*Département dAnesthésie-Réanimation, Service dORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale et Plastique, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France; and Département dAnesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sylvie Passot, Département dAnesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Bellevue, 42055 Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France. Address e-mail to sylvie.passot{at}chu-st-etienne.fr
Few studies have compared the clinical profile of target-controlled infusions of propofol with that of manually-controlled infusions. Fifty-four ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for an elective otorhinolaryngology endoscopy performed under general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation were enrolled in this prospective randomized study to compare the clinical outcome of such administrations. Before induction, all patients received a single alfentanil bolus dose (10 µg/kg). Propofol administration was adapted to maintain absence of movement, hemodynamic stability, and efficient spontaneous ventilation. When compared with the Manually-Controlled Infusion group, in the Target-Controlled Infusion group there were fewer movements at insertion of the laryngoscope (14.8% vs. 44.4%), improved hemodynamic stability (largest variations of mean arterial blood pressure <10% of control values, versus 20%), fewer episodes of apnea, and less respiratory acidosis after endoscopy (pH = 7.37 ± 0.05 and PaCO2 = 50 ± 7 mm Hg versus pH = 7.28 ± 0.06 and PaCO2 = 58 ± 9 mm Hg); the recovery was also shorter (time to opening eyes or verbal response, 4.6 ± 2.0 min and 6.8 ± 2.5 min versus 10.8 ± 7.3 min and 15.7 ± 7.1 min). Propofol consumption was comparable in the two groups. Targeting the effect-site concentration improved the time course of the propofol drug effect during direct laryngoscopy performed during spontaneous ventilation when compared with manual infusion.
IMPLICATIONS: This study compares the clinical profile of propofol anesthesia for direct laryngoscopy with spontaneous ventilation when the drug is administered either as a manually controlled infusion or by targeting the effect-site concentration through a target-controlled infusion (TCI) device. TCI improves the time course of propofol effects.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Mongardon, F. Servin, M. Perrin, E. Bedairia, S. Retout, C. Yazbeck, P. Faucher, P. Montravers, J.-M. Desmonts, and J. Guglielminotti
Predicted Propofol Effect-Site Concentration for Induction and Emergence of Anesthesia During Early Pregnancy
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2009;
109(1):
90 - 95.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Passot, F. Servin, J. Pascal, F. Charret, C. Auboyer, and S. Molliex
A Comparison of Target- and Manually Controlled Infusion Propofol and Etomidate/Desflurane Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2005;
100(5):
1338 - 1342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Frolich, D. M. Dennis, J. A. Shuster, and R. J. Melker
Precision and bias of target controlled propofol infusion for sedation
Br. J. Anaesth.,
April 1, 2005;
94(4):
434 - 437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-P. Depoix, J.-M. Julliard, P. Aubry, J.-M. Desmonts, A. Vahanian, and J. Mantz
Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Anesthesia in a Patient with Hyperkalemic Familial Periodic Paralysis
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2004;
99(1):
302 - 302.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|