JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Passot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Molliex, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Passot, S.
Right arrow Articles by Molliex, S.
Anesth Analg 2002;94:1212-1216
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Target-Controlled Versus Manually-Controlled Infusion of Propofol for Direct Laryngoscopy and Bronchoscopy

Sylvie Passot, MD*, Frédérique Servin, MD{dagger}, René Allary, MD*, Jean Pascal, MD*, Jean-Michel Prades, MD PhD{ddagger}, Christian Auboyer, MD*, and Serge Molliex, MD PhD*

*Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, {ddagger}Service d’ORL et de Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale et Plastique, Hôpital Bellevue, Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France; and {dagger}Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Sylvie Passot, Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Bellevue, 42055 Saint-Etienne Cedex 2, France. Address e-mail to sylvie.passot{at}chu-st-etienne.fr

Few studies have compared the clinical profile of target-controlled infusions of propofol with that of manually-controlled infusions. Fifty-four ASA physical status I or II patients scheduled for an elective otorhinolaryngology endoscopy performed under general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation were enrolled in this prospective randomized study to compare the clinical outcome of such administrations. Before induction, all patients received a single alfentanil bolus dose (10 µg/kg). Propofol administration was adapted to maintain absence of movement, hemodynamic stability, and efficient spontaneous ventilation. When compared with the Manually-Controlled Infusion group, in the Target-Controlled Infusion group there were fewer movements at insertion of the laryngoscope (14.8% vs. 44.4%), improved hemodynamic stability (largest variations of mean arterial blood pressure <10% of control values, versus 20%), fewer episodes of apnea, and less respiratory acidosis after endoscopy (pH = 7.37 ± 0.05 and PaCO2 = 50 ± 7 mm Hg versus pH = 7.28 ± 0.06 and PaCO2 = 58 ± 9 mm Hg); the recovery was also shorter (time to opening eyes or verbal response, 4.6 ± 2.0 min and 6.8 ± 2.5 min versus 10.8 ± 7.3 min and 15.7 ± 7.1 min). Propofol consumption was comparable in the two groups. Targeting the effect-site concentration improved the time course of the propofol drug effect during direct laryngoscopy performed during spontaneous ventilation when compared with manual infusion.

IMPLICATIONS: This study compares the clinical profile of propofol anesthesia for direct laryngoscopy with spontaneous ventilation when the drug is administered either as a manually controlled infusion or by targeting the effect-site concentration through a target-controlled infusion (TCI) device. TCI improves the time course of propofol effects.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
P. Lena, C. J. Mariottini, N. Balarac, J. J. Arnulf, A. Mihoubi, and R. Martin
Remifentanil versus propofol for radio frequency treatment of atrial flutter: [Remifentanil versus propofol pour le traitement des flutters auriculaires par radiofrequences].
Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 357 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Passot, F. Servin, J. Pascal, F. Charret, C. Auboyer, and S. Molliex
A Comparison of Target- and Manually Controlled Infusion Propofol and Etomidate/Desflurane Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1338 - 1342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. A. Frolich, D. M. Dennis, J. A. Shuster, and R. J. Melker
Precision and bias of target controlled propofol infusion for sedation
Br. J. Anaesth., April 1, 2005; 94(4): 434 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J.-P. Depoix, J.-M. Julliard, P. Aubry, J.-M. Desmonts, A. Vahanian, and J. Mantz
Propofol-Remifentanil Target-Controlled Anesthesia in a Patient with Hyperkalemic Familial Periodic Paralysis
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 302 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.