Anesth Analg 2002;94:1495-1499
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
Acetylcholine Receptors Do Not Mediate Isofluranes Actions on Spinal Cord In Vitro
Shirley M. E. Wong, MS*,
James M. Sonner, MD , and
Joan J. Kendig, PhD*
Departments of Anesthesia, *Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; and University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Address correspondence to Dr. Joan J. Kendig, Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5117. Address e-mail to kendig{at}stanford.edu
Extensive studies on anesthetic mechanisms have focused on the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and to a lesser extent on the muscarinic receptor. We designed the present study to test the hypothesis that cholinergic receptors mediate some of the depressant actions of a volatile anesthetic in rat spinal cord. The cord was removed from 2- to 7-day-old rats and superfused in vitro; ventral root potentials were evoked by stimulating a lumbar dorsal root and recording from the corresponding ipsilateral ventral root. Both nicotine and muscarine depressed the nociceptive-related slow ventral root potential (sVRP). The nicotinic antagonists mecamy-lamine, methyllycaconitine, dihydro-ß-erythroidine, and the muscarinic antagonist atropine blocked the depressant effects of the respective agonists. Isoflurane 0.3 mini- mum alveolar anesthetic concentration depressed the sVRP area to approximately 40% of control. None of the antagonists changed the extent of isoflurane depression of the sVRP. The depressant actions of cholinergic agonists suggest that cholinergic receptors are important in spinal neurotransmission, but the lack of interaction between antagonists and isoflurane suggests that cholinergic receptors have little part in mediating the actions of this anesthetic in spinal cord. Because minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration is determined primarily in spinal cord, cholinergic receptors may be eliminated as molecular targets for this anesthetic end-point.
IMPLICATIONS: Neither nicotinic nor muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists altered spinal cord actions of isoflurane, suggesting that these receptors have little role in isoflurane actions in spinal cord. Cholinergic receptors thus may be eliminated as molecular targets in determining the anesthetic end-point of immobility in response to a noxious stimulus (minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration).
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. D. Sanders, N. Patel, M. Hossain, D. Ma, and M. Maze
Isoflurane exerts antinociceptive and hypnotic properties at all ages in Fischer rats
Br. J. Anaesth.,
September 1, 2005;
95(3):
393 - 399.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Shumilla, S. M. Sweitzer, E. I Eger II, M. J. Laster, and J. J. Kendig
Inhibition of Spinal Protein Kinase C-{epsilon} or -{gamma} Isozymes Does Not Affect Halothane Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration in Rats
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2004;
99(1):
82 - 84.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Nagele, L. B. Metz, and C. M. Crowder
Nitrous oxide (N2O) requires the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for its action in Caenorhabditis elegans
PNAS,
June 8, 2004;
101(23):
8791 - 8796.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. I Eger II, Y. Zhang, M. Laster, P. Flood, J. J. Kendig, and J. M. Sonner
Acetylcholine Receptors Do Not Mediate the Immobilization Produced by Inhaled Anesthetics
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2002;
94(6):
1500 - 1504.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|