JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nyssen, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayné, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nyssen, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Mayné, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research
Right arrow Technology

Anesth Analg 2002;94:1560-1565
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


ECONOMICS AND HEALTH SYSTEMS RESEARCH

A Comparison of the Training Value of Two Types of Anesthesia Simulators: Computer Screen-Based and Mannequin-Based Simulators

Anne-Sophie Nyssen, PhD*, Robert Larbuisson, MD{dagger}, Marc Janssens, MD{dagger}, Philippe Pendeville, MD{ddagger}, and Alain Mayné, MD{ddagger}

*Department of Work Psychology, University of Liège; {dagger}Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liège; and {ddagger}Department of Anesthesiology, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium

Address correspondence and reprint requests to A.-S. Nyssen, PhD, Department of Work Psychology, Bat. B-32 FAPSE, University of Liège, 4000 LIEGE Sart-Tilman, Belgium. Address e-mail to asnyssen{at}ulg.ac.be

In this study, we compared two different training simulators (the computer screen-based simulator versus the full-scale simulator) with respect to training effectiveness in anesthesia residents. Participants were evaluated in the management of a simulated preprogrammed scenario of anaphylactic shock using two variables: treatment score and diagnosis time. Our results showed that simulators can contribute significantly to the improvement of performance but that learning in treating simulated crisis situations such as anaphylactic shock did not significantly vary between full-scale and computer screen-based simulators. Consequently, the initial decision on whether to use a full-scale or computer screen-based training simulator should be made on the basis of cost and learning objectives rather than on the basis of technical or fidelity criteria. Our results support the contention that screen-based simulators are good devices to acquire technical skills of crisis management. Mannequin-based simulators would probably provide better training for behavioral aspects of crisis management, such as communication, leadership, and interpersonal conflicts, but this was not tested in the current study.

IMPLICATIONS: We compared two different training simulators (computer screen-based versus full-scale) for training anesthesia residents to better document the effectiveness of such devices as training tools. This is an important issue, given the extensive use and the high cost of mannequin-based simulators in anesthesiology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
J B Cooper and V R Taqueti
A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training
Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2008; 84(997): 563 - 570.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
M. P. Eason
Simulation Devices in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2005; 9(4): 309 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J B Cooper and V R Taqueti
A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(suppl_1): i11 - i18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Taekman, G. Hobbs, L. Barber, B. G. Phillips-Bute, M. C. Wright, M. F. Newman, and M. Stafford-Smith
Preliminary Report on the Use of High-Fidelity Simulation in the Training of Study Coordinators Conducting a Clinical Research Protocol
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2004; 99(2): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. Coonan
Comparison of Computer Based and Patient Simulator Based Crisis
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2003; 96(4): 1236 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.