This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Siddik-Sayyid, S. M. Articles by Baraka, A. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Siddik-Sayyid, S. M. Articles by Baraka, A. S. Related Collections Obstetrics Regional Anesthesia Pharmacology

---

OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

Intrathecal Versus Intravenous Fentanyl for Supplementation of Subarachnoid Block During Cesarean Delivery

Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut, Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Anis Baraka, MD, FRCA, Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon. Address e-mail to abaraka{at}aub.edu.lb

Forty-eight healthy parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery were randomly allocated to receive intrathecally either 12 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 12.5 µg of fentanyl (n = 23) or bupivacaine alone (n = 25). In the latter group, IV 12.5 µg of fentanyl was administered immediately after spinal anesthesia. We compared the amount of IV fentanyl required for supplementation of the spinal anesthesia during surgery, the intraoperative visual analog scale, the time to the first request for postoperative analgesia, and the incidence of adverse effects. Additional IV fentanyl supplementation amounting to a mean of 32 ± 35 µg was required in the IV Fentanyl group, whereas no supple- mentation was required in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group (P = 0.009). The time to the first request for postoperative analgesia was significantly longer in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group than in the IV Fentanyl group (159 ± 39 min versus 119 ± 44 min; P = 0.003). The incidence of systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg and the ephedrine requirements were significantly higher in the IV Fentanyl group as compared with the Intrathecal Fentanyl group (P = 0.01). Also, intraoperative nausea and vomiting occurred less frequently in the Intrathecal Fentanyl group compared with the IV Fentanyl group (8 of 23 vs 17 of 25; P = 0.02).

IMPLICATIONS: Supplementation of spinal bupivacaine anesthesia for cesarean delivery with intrathecal fentanyl provides a better quality of anesthesia and is associated with a decreased incidence of side effects as compared with supplementation with the same dose of IV fentanyl.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M F Khan, O B Omole, and G J O Marincowitz Postoperative analgesia following caesarean deliveries in a rural health district of South Africa Trop Doct, October 1, 2009; 39(4): 217 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Gadsden, S. Hart, and A. C. Santos Post-Cesarean Delivery Analgesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S62 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Paech, T. J. G. Pavy, C. E. P. Orlikowski, S. T. Yeo, S. L. Banks, S. F. Evans, and J. Henderson Postcesarean Analgesia with Spinal Morphine, Clonidine, or Their Combination Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1460 - 1466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Vath and D. J. Kopacz Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: The Effect of Added Fentanyl Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 89 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]