This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Takahashi, S. Articles by Toyooka, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Takahashi, S. Articles by Toyooka, H. Related Collections Airway Monitoring (Cardiac)

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation with Laryngoscope Versus Lightwand Intubating Device (Trachlight^®) in Adults with Normal Airway

Shinji Takahashi, MD^*, Taro Mizutani, MD, Masayuki Miyabe, MD^*, and Hidenori Toyooka, MD^*

Departments of *Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shinji Takahashi, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tenodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba-city 305-8575, Japan. Address email to shinjitk{at}md.tsukuba.ac.jp

Lightwand devices are effective and safe as an aid to tracheal intubation. Theoretically, avoiding direct-vision laryngoscopy could allow for less stimulation by intubation than the conventional laryngoscopic procedure. We designed this prospective randomized study to assess the cardiovascular changes after either lightwand or direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation in adult patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. Sixty healthy adult patients with normal airways were randomly assigned to one of three groups according to intubating procedure under sevoflurane/nitrous oxide anesthesia (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.33) (n = 20 each). The lightwand group received tracheal intubation with Trachlight^®, the laryngoscope-intubation group received tracheal intubation with a direct-vision laryngoscope (Macintosh blade), and the laryngoscopy-alone group received the laryngoscope alone. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were recorded continuously for 5 min after tracheal intubation or laryngoscopy with enough time to intubate. All procedures were successful on the first attempt. The maximum heart rate and systolic blood pressure values obtained after intubation with Trachlight (114 ± 20 bpm and 143 ± 30 mm Hg, respectively) did not differ from those with the Macintosh laryngoscope (114 ± 20 bpm and 138 ± 23 mm Hg), but they were significantly larger than those in the laryngoscopy-alone group (94 ± 19 bpm and 112 ± 21 mm Hg) (P < 0.05). Direct stimulation of the trachea appears to be a major cause of the hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation.

IMPLICATIONS: The magnitude of hemodynamic changes associated with tracheal intubation with the Trachlight^® is almost the same as that which occurs with the direct laryngoscope. Hemodynamic changes are likely to occur because of direct tracheal irritation rather than direct stimulation of the larynx.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-y. Rhee, J.-r. Lee, J. Kim, S. Park, W.-K. Kwon, and S. Han A Comparison of Lighted Stylet (Surch-LiteTM) and Direct Laryngoscopic Intubation in Patients with High Mallampati Scores Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1215 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. F. Reynolds and J. Heffner Airway Management of the Critically Ill Patient: Rapid-Sequence Intubation Chest, April 1, 2005; 127(4): 1397 - 1412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Singh and J. E. Smith Cardiovascular changes after the three stages of nasotracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 667 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Hemodynamic Responses to Intubation with Trachlight vs. Laryngoscope Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, October 29, 2002; 2002(1029): 13 - 13. [Full Text]