JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Quinlan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Homanics, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Quinlan, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Homanics, G. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2002;95:578-582
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY

Mice with Glycine Receptor Subunit Mutations Are Both Sensitive and Resistant to Volatile Anesthetics

Joseph J. Quinlan, MD*, Carolyn Ferguson, BS*, Katherine Jester, BS*, Leonard L. Firestone, MD*, and Gregg E. Homanics, PhD*{dagger}

Departments of *Anesthesiology and {dagger}Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Gregg E. Homanics, PhD, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Anesthesiology, W1356 Biomedical Science Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Address e-mail to homanicsge{at}anes.upmc.edu

We used two mouse lines with glycine receptor mutations to determine whether glycine receptors might play an important role in anesthetic responses in vivo. Spastic (spA) mutants were slightly more sensitive (P = 0.02) to enflurane in the loss-of-righting reflex assay (50% effective concentration [EC50] = 1.17 ± 0.06 atm for controls versus 0.97 ± 0.06 atm for spA) but were also substantially more resistant (P = 0.01) to enflurane in the tail clamp assay (EC50 = 1.96 ± 0.10 atm for controls versus 2.58 ± 0.25 atm for spA). spA mice were also more sensitive to halothane (P < 0.001) in the loss-of-righting reflex assay (EC50 = 0.81 ± 0.03 atm for controls versus 0.57 ± 0.04 atm for spA), but the responses of mutant and control mice to tail clamp in the presence of halothane were similar. Spasmodic control and mutant mice did not differ in their responses to the two drugs. Sleep time was substantially longer in both mutant mouse lines after injection of three hypnotics (midazolam, pentobarbital, and ethanol). Our results suggest a complex involvement of glycinergic pathways in mediating anesthetic responses. Greater sensitivity to the hypnotic effect of enflurane, halothane, midazolam, pentobarbital, and ethanol in mutant mice with diminished glycinergic capacity suggests that glycinergic activity is inversely related to hypnosis, whereas resistance to enflurane in the tail clamp assay suggests that glycinergic activity potentiates the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration response. Halothane seems to share some, but not all, of enflurane’s mechanisms, indicating that not all volatile anesthetics modulate glycinergic pathways equally.

IMPLICATIONS: We tested two mouse lines with glycine receptor mutations to determine whether glycine receptors might play an important role in anesthetic responses in vivo. Both sensitivity and resistance to common anesthetics were observed in mutant mice, depending on the behavioral end-point evaluated.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. T. Welsh, B. E. Goldstein, and S. J. Mihic
Single-Channel Analysis of Ethanol Enhancement of Glycine Receptor Function
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2009; 330(1): 198 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
E. I. Eger II, D. E. Raines, S. L. Shafer, H. C. Hemmings Jr, and J. M. Sonner
Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 832 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. M. Sedensky and P. G. Morgan
Genetics and the Evolution of the Anesthetic Response
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 855 - 858.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. G. Bovill
Anesthetic Pharmacology: Reflections of a Section Editor
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2007; 105(5): 1186 - 1190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Nagele, L. B. Metz, and C. M. Crowder
Nitrous oxide (N2O) requires the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor for its action in Caenorhabditis elegans
PNAS, June 8, 2004; 101(23): 8791 - 8796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. M. Sonner, J. F. Antognini, R. C. Dutton, P. Flood, A. T. Gray, R. A. Harris, G. E. Homanics, J. Kendig, B. Orser, D. E. Raines, et al.
Inhaled Anesthetics and Immobility: Mechanisms, Mysteries, and Minimum Alveolar Anesthetic Concentration
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 718 - 740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. L. Thio, A. Shanmugam, K. Isenberg, and K. Yamada
Benzodiazepines Block {alpha}2-Containing Inhibitory Glycine Receptors in Embryonic Mouse Hippocampal Neurons
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 89 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.