JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aveline, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aveline, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bonnet, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2002;95:735-740
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA

The Effect of Clonidine on the Minimum Local Analgesic Concentration of Epidural Ropivacaine During Labor

Chritophe Aveline, MD, Sonia El Metaoua, MD, Anis Masmoudi, MD, Pierre-Yves Boelle, PhD, and Francis Bonnet, MD

Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital TENON, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Francis Bonnet, Département d’Anesthésie-Réanimation Chirurgicale, Hôpital TENON, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 4 Rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France. Address e-mail to francis.bonnet{at}tnn.ap-hop-paris.fr

On the basis of the determination of minimum local analgesic concentration (MLAC), ropivacaine has been demonstrated to be less potent than bupivacaine during the first stage of labor. In this study we assessed the effect of clonidine on the MLAC of ropivacaine. Seventy-seven parturients of mixed parity requesting epidural analgesia for labor (cervical dilation, 3–7 cm) were included in the study. They received an epidural bolus of either ropivacaine (n = 30), ropivacaine plus clonidine 30 µg (n = 28), or ropivacaine plus clonidine 60 µg (n = 19) in the second part of the study. The concentration of the ropivacaine solution was determined by the response of the previous parturient in that group by using an up-down sequential allocation. A visual analog pain score of <=10 mm within 30 min after the epidural bolus (20 mL) was considered an effective response. An effective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol decrement for the next patient. An ineffective result directed a 0.01% wt/vol increment. The MLAC of ropivacaine was 0.097% wt/vol (95% confidence interval, 0.085%–0.108%). It was unaffected by a 30-µg dose of epidural clonidine (0.081% [0.045%–0.117%]) but was significantly decreased by a 60-µg clonidine dose (0.035% [0.024%–0.046%]) (P < 0.001). This study documents a decrease in the MLAC of ropivacaine by clonidine, significant for a 60-µg dose.

IMPLICATIONS: Epidural ropivacaine potency in labor can be increased by the addition of epidural clonidine. This study demonstrates that 60 µg of epidural clonidine significantly decreases the minimum local analgesic concentration of ropivacaine during the first stage of labor but is associated with sedation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Casati, F. Vinciguerra, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, G. Fanelli, M. Putzu, and J. E. Chelly
Adding Clonidine to the Induction Bolus and Postoperative Infusion During Continuous Femoral Nerve Block Delays Recovery of Motor Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 866 - 872.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.