JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (37) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brimacombe, J. Articles by Brimacombe, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brimacombe, J. Articles by Brimacombe, L. Related Collections Airway Equipment

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal^TM and the Laryngeal Tube Airway in Paralyzed Anesthetized Adult Patients Undergoing Pressure-Controlled Ventilation

Joseph Brimacombe, MB ChB, FRCA, MD^*, Christian Keller, MD, and Lawrence Brimacombe, MB ChB^*

*Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns, Australia; and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Leopold-Franzens University, Innsbruck, Austria

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Professor Joseph Brimacombe, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairns Base Hospital, The Esplanade, Cairns 4870, Australia. Address e-mail to jbrimacombe{at}austarnet.com.au

We compared the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal^TM (PLMA^TM) and the laryngeal tube airway (LTA), two new extraglottic airway devices, with respect to: 1) insertion success rates and times, 2) efficacy of seal, 3) ventilatory variables during pressure-controlled ventilation, 4) tidal volume in different head/neck positions, and 5) airway interventional requirements. One-hundred-twenty paralyzed anesthetized ASA physical status I and II adult patients were randomly allocated to the PLMA^TM or LTA for airway management. A standardized anesthesia protocol was followed by two anesthesiologists experienced with both devices. The criteria for an effective airway included a minimal expired tidal volume of 6 mL/kg during pressure-controlled ventilation at 17 cm H₂O with no oropharyngeal leak or gastric insufflation. First attempt success rates at achieving an effective airway were similar (PLMA^TM: 85%; LTA: 87%), but after 3 attempts, success was more frequent for the PLMA^TM (100% versus 92%, P = 0.02). Effective airway time was similar. Oropharyngeal leak pressure was larger for PLMA^TM at 50% maximal recommended cuff volume (29 ± 7 versus 21 ± 6 cm H₂O, P < 0.0001), but was similar at the maximal recommended cuff volume (33 ± 7 versus 31 ± 8 cm H₂O). Tidal volumes (614 ± 173 versus 456 ± 207 mL, P < 0.0001) were larger and ETCO₂ (33 ± 9 versus 40 ± 11 mm Hg, P = 0.0001) lower for the PLMA^TM. The number of airway interventions was significantly less frequent for the PLMA^TM. Airway obstruction was more common with the LTA. When comparing mean tidal volumes in different head/neck positions, the quality of airway was unchanged in 56 of 60 patients (93%) with the PLMA^TM and 42 of 55 (76%) with the LTA (P = 0.01). The PLMA^TM offers advantages over the LTA in most technical aspects of airway management in paralyzed patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.

IMPLICATIONS: The laryngeal mask airway ProSeal^TM offers advantages over the laryngeal tube airway in most technical aspects of airway management in paralyzed patients undergoing pressure-controlled ventilation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Eschertzhuber, J. Brimacombe, M. Hohlrieder, K.-H. Stadlbauer, and C. Keller Gum Elastic Bougie-Guided Insertion of the ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Is Superior to the Digital and Introducer Tool Techniques in Patients with Simulated Difficult Laryngoscopy Using a Rigid Neck Collar Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2008; 107(4): 1253 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hohlrieder, J. Brimacombe, A. von Goedecke, and C. Keller Postoperative nausea, vomiting, airway morbidity, and analgesic requirements are lower for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway than the tracheal tube in females undergoing breast and gynaecological surgery Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2007; 99(4): 576 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Garcia-Aguado, J. Vinoles, J. Brimacombe, M. Vivo, R. Lopez-Estudillo, and G. Ayala Suction catheter guided insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital technique: [L'insertion du masque larynge ProSealTM, guidee par une sonde d'aspiration, est superieure a la technique digitale]. Can J Anesth, April 1, 2006; 53(4): 398 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Asai and K. Shingu The laryngeal tube Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2005; 95(6): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, G. Lee, and J. P. Nolan The ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature: [Le masque larynge ProSealTM : un examen des publications] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2005; 52(7): 739 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Matioc and J. Olson Use of the Laryngeal TubeTM in two unexpected difficult airway situations: lingual tonsillar hyperplasia and morbid obesity: [L'usage du Laryngeal TubeTM dans deux situations d'intubation difficile inattendue : hyperplasie des amygdales linguales et obesite morbide] Can J Anesth, December 1, 2004; 51(10): 1018 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Miller A Proposed Classification and Scoring System for Supraglottic Sealing Airways: A Brief Review Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2004; 99(5): 1553 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Hemmerling, P. Beaulieu, K. E. Jacobi, D. Babin, and J. Schmidt Neuromuscular blockade does not change the incidence or severity of pharyngolaryngeal discomfort after LMA anesthesia: [Le blocage neuromusculaire ne modifie pas l'incidence ou la severite de l'inconfort pharyngo-larynge apres l'anesthesie avec un ML] Can J Anesth, August 1, 2004; 51(7): 728 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Vaida, D. Gaitini, B. Ben-David, M. Somri, C. A. Hagberg, and L. A. Gaitini A New Supraglottic Airway, the Elisha Airway Device: A Preliminary Study Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 124 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				O. Akca, A. Wadhwa, P. Sengupta, J. Durrani, K. Hanni, M. Wenke, Y. Yucel, R. Lenhardt, A. G. Doufas, and D. I. Sessler The New Perilaryngeal Airway (CobraPLATM) Is as Efficient as the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMATM) but Provides Better Airway Sealing Pressures Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 272 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. M. Dunn, L. Robbins, N. R. Connelly, and W. H. Rosenblatt The LMA ProSeal TM May Not Be the Best Option for Difficult to Intubate/Ventilate Patients * Response Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2004; 99(1): 310 - 311. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Asai and K. Shingu Time-Related Cuff Pressures of the Laryngeal Tube With and Without the Use of Nitrous Oxide Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1803 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, C. McKinstry, R. Hardy, and S. Twigg Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube(R) during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2003; 91(5): 678 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, B. McCormick, and T. Asai Randomized comparison of laryngeal tube with classic laryngeal mask airway for anaesthesia with controlled ventilation Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2003; 91(3): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. V. Genzwuerker, H. Roth, J. Schmeck, J. Brimacombe, K. Hill, and C. Keller Comparing Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal and Laryngeal Tube * Response Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2003; 96(5): 1535 - 1536. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. M. Cook, R. Hardy, C. McKinstry, S. Twigg, H. V. Genzwuerker, and T. Vollmer Use of the laryngeal tube as a dedicated airway during tracheal intubation Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 397 - 399. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. O'Neil, J. Brimacombe, C. Richardson, C. Keller, and S. Donald Mechanical closure of the vocal cords with the LMA ProSealTM Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2002; 89(6): 936 - 937. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999