| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Giorgio Della Rocca, MD, C.so Trieste 169/A, 00198 Rome, Italy. Address e-mail to giorgio.dellarocca{at}uniroma1.it
In this study, during lung transplantation, we analyzed a conventional preload index, the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), and a new preload index, the intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI), derived from the single-indicator transpulmonary dilution technique (PiCCO System), with respect to stroke volume index (SVIpa). We also evaluated the relationships between changes (
) in ITBVI and PAOP and
SVIpa during lung transplantation. The reproducibility and precision of all cardiac index measurements obtained with the transpulmonary single-indicator dilution technique (CIart) and with the pulmonary artery thermodilution technique (CIpa) were also determined. Measurements were made in 50 patients monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter and with a PiCCO System at six stages throughout the study. Changes in the variables were calculated by subtracting the first from the second measurement (
1) and so on (
1 to
5). The linear correlation between ITBVI and SVIpa was significant (r2=0.41; P < 0.0001), whereas PAOP poorly correlated with SVIpa (r2 = -0.01). Changes in ITBVI correlated with changes in SVIpa (
1, r2 = 0.30;
2, r2 = 0.57;
4, r2 = 0.26; and
5, r2 = 0.67), whereas PAOP failed. The mean bias between CIart and CIpa was 0.15 l · min-1 · m-2 (1.37). In conclusion, ITBVI is a valid indicator of cardiac preload and may be superior to PAOP in patients undergoing lung transplantation.
IMPLICATIONS: The assessment of intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) by the transpulmonary single-indicator technique is a useful tool in lung transplant patients, providing a valid index of cardiac preload that may be superior to pulmonary artery occlusion pressure. However, more prospective, randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the role and limitations of this technique.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Isakow and D. P. Schuster Extravascular lung water measurements and hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: bedside alternatives to the pulmonary artery catheter Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): L1118 - L1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Cheng, K.-C. Chan, C.-T. Chien, W.-Z. Sun, and C.-J. Lin Oxidative stress during 1-lung ventilation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2006; 132(3): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Reuter and A. E. Goetz Differentiating "Volumetric Preload Monitoring" and Assessing "Fluid Responsiveness" Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 651 - 652. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Hofer, L. Furrer, S. Matter-Ensner, M. Maloigne, R. Klaghofer, M. Genoni, and A. Zollinger Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2005; 94(6): 748 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Reuter, T. Goresch, M. S. G. Goepfert, S. M. Wildhirt, E. Kilger, and A. E. Goetz Effects of mid-line thoracotomy on the interaction between mechanical ventilation and cardiac filling during cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2004; 92(6): 808 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|