Anesth Analg 2002;95:907-914
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society
ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY
The Actions of Propofol on -Aminobutyric Acid-A and Glycine Receptors in Acutely Dissociated Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons of the Rat
Xian-Ping Dong, MS, and
Tian-Le Xu, PhD MD
Laboratory of Receptor Pharmacology, Department of Neurobiology and Biophysics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Peoples Republic of China
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tian-Le Xu, PhD, MD, Laboratory of Receptor Pharmacology, Department of Neurobiology & Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, PO Box 4, Hefei 230027, Peoples Republic of China. Address e-mail to xutianle{at}ustc.edu.cn
The spinal cord plays an important role in modulating anesthetic-induced suppression of nociceptive transmission. To gain some insight into the anesthetic mechanisms of propofol at the spinal level, we investigated the direct action of propofol and its modulation on the -aminobutyric acid-A receptor (GABAAR) and the glycine receptor (GlyR) in acutely dissociated rat spinal dorsal horn neurons by using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. Propofol induced Cl- currents (ICl), which were sensitive to bicuculline and, to a lesser extent, to strychnine. The activation, desensitization, and deactivation of propofol-induced ICl were slower than those of GABA- and glycine-induced ICl. In addition, this study revealed similar modulatory actions of propofol on GABAAR and GlyR. Propofol potentiated both GABA- and glycine-induced ICl at small con-centrations and inhibited both GABA- and glycine-induced ICl at large concentrations. The potentiation of propofol on ICl was caused by slowing current desensitization and deactivation, whereas the inhibition actions might be involved in the cross-desensitization between GABA- and propofol-induced ICl and the cross-inhibition between the GABAAR and GlyR. The results suggest that propofol facilitation of GABAAR and GlyR at the spinal level could contribute significantly to general anesthetic-induced analgesia and anesthesia.
IMPLICATIONS: The actions of propofol on the -aminobutyric acid-A receptor (GABAAR) and the glycine receptor (GlyR) were investigated in acutely dissociated rat spinal dorsal horn neurons by using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. Propofol was found to potentiate the functions of GABAAR and GlyR at the spinal level, which might contribute to propofol-induced analgesia and anesthesia.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Singler, A. Troster, N. Manering, J. Schuttler, and W. Koppert
Modulation of Remifentanil-Induced Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by Propofol
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2007;
104(6):
1397 - 1403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-X. Yang, H. Xu, K.-Q. Zhou, M.-Y. Wang, and T.-L. Xu
Modulation of Gamma-Aminobutyric AcidA Receptor Function by Thiopental in the Rat Spinal Dorsal Horn Neurons.
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2006;
102(4):
1114 - 1120.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-J. Feng and R. L. Macdonald
Multiple Actions of Propofol on {alpha}{beta}{gamma} and {alpha}{beta}{delta} GABAA Receptors
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2004;
66(6):
1517 - 1524.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Ahrens, G. Haeseler, M. Leuwer, B. Mohammadi, K. Krampfl, R. Dengler, and J. Bufler
2,6 Di-tert-butylphenol, a Nonanesthetic Propofol Analog, Modulates {alpha}1{beta} Glycine Receptor Function in a Manner Distinct from Propofol
Anesth. Analg.,
July 1, 2004;
99(1):
91 - 96.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shirasaka, Y. Yoshimura, D.-L. Qiu, and M. Takasaki
The Effects of Propofol on Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus Neurons in the Rat
Anesth. Analg.,
April 1, 2004;
98(4):
1017 - 1023.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. G. Logginidou, B.-H. Li, D.-P. Li, J. S. Lohmann, H. G. Schuler, N. A. DiVittore, S. Kreiser, and A. J. Cronin
Propofol Suppresses the Cortical Somatosensory Evoked Potential in Rats
Anesth. Analg.,
December 1, 2003;
97(6):
1784 - 1788.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|