JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pirat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arslan, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pirat, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arslan, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart
Right arrow Pediatrics
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2002;95:1207-1214
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA

Intrathecal Versus IV Fentanyl in Pediatric Cardiac Anesthesia

Arash Pirat, MD, Elif Akpek, MD, and Gülnaz Arslan, MD

Department of Anesthesiology, Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Address correspondence to Arash Pirat, MD, Baskent Üniversitesi Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji Anabilim Dali, 10. Sok. No. 45, Bahçelievler, 06490 Ankara, Turkey. Address e-mail to arashpirat{at}hotmail.com No reprints available.

Systemic large-dose opioids are widely used in pediatric cardiac anesthesia, but there are no randomized, prospective studies regarding the use of intrathecal (IT) opioids for these procedures. In this randomized, prospective study, we compared cardiovascular and neurohumoral responses during IT or IV fentanyl anesthesia for pediatric cardiac surgery. Thirty children aged 6 mo to 6 yr were anesthetized with an IV fentanyl bolus of 10 µg/kg. This was followed by a fentanyl infusion of 10 µg · kg-1 · h-1 (Group IV; n = 10), 2 µg/kg of IT fentanyl (Group IT; n = 10), or combined IV and IT protocols (Group IV + IT; n = 10). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, additional fentanyl doses, time to first analgesic requirement, COMFORT and Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale scores, and extubation time were recorded. Blood cortisol, insulin, glucose, and lactate levels were measured presurgery, poststernotomy, during the rewarming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and 6 and 24 h after surgery. The patients’ urinary cortisol excretion rates were also measured during the first postoperative day. The findings in all three groups were statistically similar, except for higher blood glucose levels during CPB in Group IT compared with Group IV (P < 0.004). Group IV + IT was the only group in which the increases in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure from presurgery to poststernotomy were not significant. The 24-h urinary cortisol excretion rates (µg · kg-1 · d-1) were 61.51 ± 39, 92.54 ± 67.55, and 40.15 ± 29.69 for Groups IV, IT, and IV + IT, respectively (P > 0.05). A single IT injection of fentanyl 2 µg/kg offers no advantage over systemic fentanyl (10 µg/kg bolus and 10 µg · kg-1 · h-1) with regard to hemodynamic stability or suppression of stress response. The combination of these two regimens may provide better hemodynamic stability during the pre-CPB period and may be associated with a decreased 24-h urinary cortisol excretion rate.

IMPLICATIONS: In this prospective, randomized study, we investigated the adequacy of a single intrathecal injection of fentanyl for intraoperative analgesia, compared the effects of IT and IV fentanyl on stress response, and assessed for an additive effect of IT and IV fentanyl administration in pediatric cardiac anesthesia. The results with these three different anesthetic regimens were similar regarding anesthesia depth and level of stress response. However, the combination of IT and IV routes may provide better hemodynamic stability and a less pronounced stress response, as reflected by 24-h urinary cortisol excretion.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. B. Hammer, C. Ramamoorthy, H. Cao, G. D. Williams, M. G. Boltz, K. Kamra, and D. R. Drover
Postoperative Analgesia After Spinal Blockade in Infants and Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2005; 100(5): 1283 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.