JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macias, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hidalgo, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macias, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hidalgo, F.
Related Collections
Right arrow Postanesthetic Care Unit
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology

Anesth Analg 2002;95:1344-1350
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


PAIN MEDICINE

A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine, Ropivacaine/Fentanyl, or Bupivacaine/Fentanyl for Postthoracotomy Analgesia

Antonio Macias, MD*, Pablo Monedero, MD PhD*, María Adame, MD PhD*, Wenceslao Torre, MD PhD{dagger}, Isabel Fidalgo, MD*, and Francisco Hidalgo, MD PhD*

*Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care and {dagger}Thoracic Surgery Service, Clinica Universitaria, University of Navarra, Spain

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Pablo Monedero, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Clinica Universitaria, Pio XII, 36.31008 Pamplona, Spain. Address e-mail to pmonedero{at}unav.es

Epidural ropivacaine has not been compared with bupivacaine for postthoracotomy analgesia. Eighty patients undergoing elective lung surgery were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive one of three solutions for high thoracic epidural analgesia. A continuous epidural infusion of 0.1 mL · kg-1 · h-1 of either 0.2% ropivacaine, 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl 5 µg/mL, or 0.1% bupivacaine/fentanyl 5 µg/mL was started at admission to the intensive care unit. We assessed pain scores (rest and spirometry), IV morphine consumption, spirometry, hand grip strength, PaCO2, heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and side effects (sedation, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) for 48 h. Thoracic epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl provided adequate pain relief similar to bupivacaine/fentanyl during the first 2 postoperative days after posterolateral thoracotomy. The use of plain 0.2% ropivacaine was associated with worse pain control during spirometry, larger consumption of IV morphine, and increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Morphine requirements were larger in the ropivacaine group, with no differences between bupivacaine/fentanyl and ropivacaine/fentanyl groups. Patients in the ropivacaine group experienced more pain and performed worse in spirometry than patients who received epidural fentanyl. There was no significant difference in motor block. We conclude that epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl offers no clinical advantage compared with bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia.

IMPLICATIONS: Thoracic epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl provided adequate pain relief and similar analgesia to bupivacaine/fentanyl during the first 2 postoperative days after posterolateral thoracotomy. Plain 0.2% ropivacaine was associated with worse pain control and an increased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We conclude that epidural ropivacaine/fentanyl offers no clinical advantage compared with bupivacaine/fentanyl for postthoracotomy analgesia.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. Panousis, A. R. Heller, T. Koch, and R. J. Litz
Epidural Ropivacaine Concentrations for Intraoperative Analgesia During Major Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study
Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2009; 108(6): 1971 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. P. Joshi, F. Bonnet, R. Shah, R. C. Wilkinson, F. Camu, B. Fischer, E. A. M. Neugebauer, N. Rawal, S. A. Schug, C. Simanski, et al.
A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials Evaluating Regional Techniques for Postthoracotomy Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 1026 - 1040.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. J. Fibla, L. Molins, J. M. Mier, A. Sierra, and G. Vidal
Comparative analysis of analgesic quality in the postoperative of thoracotomy: paravertebral block with bupivacaine 0.5% vs ropivacaine 0.2%
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 33(3): 430 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
C. Bauer, J.-G. Hentz, X. Ducrocq, M. Nicolas, M. Oswald-Mammosser, A. Steib, and J.-P. Dupeyron
Lung Function After Lobectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Trial Comparing Thoracic Epidural Ropivacaine/Sufentanil and Intravenous Morphine for Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 238 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
B. S. von Ungern-Sternberg, A. Regli, A. Reber, and M. C. Schneider
Effect of obesity and thoracic epidural analgesia on perioperative spirometry
Br. J. Anaesth., January 1, 2005; 94(1): 121 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.