| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
*National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Bethesda, Maryland; University of Maryland, School of Dentistry, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Nursing, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; and Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Raymond A. Dionne, 10 Center Drive, Room 1N-117, Bethesda, MD 20892-1191. Address e-mail to raymond.dionne{at}nih.gov
Peripheral neuronal barrage from tissue injury produces central nervous system changes that contribute to the maintenance of postoperative pain. The therapeutic approaches to blocking these central changes remain controversial, because previous studies have not differentiated presurgical interventions from those administered after tissue injury, yet before pain onset. In this study, we evaluated the relative contributions of blockade of nociceptive input during surgery or during the immediate postoperative period on pain suppression. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of four groups: preoperative 2% lidocaine, postoperative 0.5% bupivacaine, both, or placebo injections. General anesthesia was induced and third molars extracted. Pain was assessed over 4 h and at 24 and 48 h. The ß-endorphin in blood samples increased twofold during surgery, which is indicative of activation of the peripheral nociceptive barrage in response to painful stimuli. Pain was decreased in the immediate postoperative period in the bupivacaine groups, whereas it increased in the lidocaine group over time. Pain intensity was less 48 h after surgery in the groups whose postoperative pain was blocked by the administration of bupivacaine, but no effect was demonstrated for the preoperative administration of lidocaine alone. These results in the oral surgery pain model suggest that minimizing the peripheral nociceptive barrage during the immediate postoperative period decreases pain at later time periods. In contrast, blocking the intraoperative nociceptive barrage does not appear to contribute significantly to the subsequent reduction in pain.
IMPLICATIONS: Suppression of postoperative pain immediately after surgery attenuates the pain experienced 1 to 2 days after surgery. These findings suggest that pain after minor surgery can be prevented by blocking the development of pain processes that amplify pain for days after surgery.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Gordon, B. P. Chuang, X. M. Wang, M. A. Hamza, J. S. Rowan, J. S. Brahim, and R. A. Dionne The Differential Effects of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine on Prostaglandin E2 Release, Cyclooxygenase Gene Expression and Pain in a Clinical Pain Model Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 321 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Kissin Preemptive Analgesia at the Crossroad Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2005; 100(3): 754 - 756. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. GORDON and R. A. DIONNE The integration of clinical research into dental therapeutics: The role of the astute clinician J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2004; 135(11): 1537 - 1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
