JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nishikawa, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular
Right arrow Monitoring (Cardiac)
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia

Anesth Analg 2002;95:1408-1411
© 2002 International Anesthesia Research Society


REGIONAL ANESTHESIA

Does the Choice of Electrocardiography Lead Affect the Efficacy of the T-Wave Criterion for Detecting Intravascular Injection of an Epinephrine Test Dose?

Makoto Tanaka, MD, and Toshiaki Nishikawa, MD

Department of Anesthesia, Akita University School of Medicine, Akita-city, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Makoto Tanaka, MD, Department of Anesthesia, Akita University School of Medicine, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita-city, Akita 010-8543, Japan. Address e-mail to mtanaka{at}med akita-u.ac.jp.

Accidental intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose decreases the T-wave amplitude of a Lead II electrocardiogram (EKG) with 100% sensitivity and specificity on the basis of the T-wave criterion (positive if there is a >=25% decrease in amplitude). We designed this study to test whether the choice of EKG lead would affect the efficacy of the simulated intravascular test dose in anesthetized patients. After an 8-h fast and no premedication, 35 healthy patients were anesthetized with end-tidal 2% sevoflurane and nitrous oxide after endotracheal intubation. When hemodynamic stability was obtained, all subjects received 3 mL of normal saline IV, followed 4 min later by 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL plus 15 µg of epinephrine (1:200,000) IV. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, Leads II (n = 35) and V5 (n = 35), and either Lead I (n = 17) or III (n = 18), whichever had the greater T-wave amplitude, were continuously recorded for 4 min after the saline and test-dose injections. An IV test dose produced significant increases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure and produced decreases in the T-wave amplitude of all EKG leads studied in all subjects, whereas IV saline elicited no changes in these variables. The maximum percentage decreases in T-wave amplitude of Leads II, I, III, and V5 were -87% ± 13%, -88% ± 8%, -94% ± 15%, and -86% ± 16%, respectively (mean ± SD; P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in temporal changes in T-wave amplitude among the 4 leads, and sensitivity and specificity were 100% on the basis of the T-wave criterion, irrespective of the lead examined. Our results indicate that Leads II, I, III, and V5 of the EKG are equally effective for detecting intravascular injection of the epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults.

IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidural catheter is in a blood vessel, an epidural test dose containing 15 µg of epinephrine is used. We found that decreases in the T-wave amplitude of Leads I, II, III, and V5 of the electrocardiogram were equally sensitive and specific for detecting intravascular injection of the test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized adult patients.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. Guay
The epidural test dose: a review.
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2006; 102(3): 921 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2002 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.