| JOURNAL HOME | CME HOME | THIS MONTH | PAST ISSUES | ETOC | COLLECTIONS |
| AUTHORS | REVIEWERS | EDITORIAL BOARD | FEEDBACK | RSS | HELP |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Departments of *Nursing and Anesthesiology, University Hospital Center of Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; and Department of Biostatistics, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Françoise M. Bardiau, RN, PhD, Department of Nursing, Charleroi University Hospital Center, 92 Blvd. Paul Janson, 6000 Charleroi, Belgium. Address e-mail to francoise.bardiau{at}chu-charleroi.be
This study, conducted before and after the implementation of an acute pain service (APS) in a 1000-bed hospital, describes the process of the implementation of an APS. The nursing, anesthesia, and surgery departments were involved. In this study we sought to evaluate the results of a continuous quality improvement program by defining quality indicators and using quality tools. A quality program in accordance with current standards of acute pain treatment (multimodal) was worked out to enhance pain relief for all surgical inpatients. A survey of nurses’ knowledge with regard to postoperative pain was conducted, and a visual analog scale (VAS) was introduced to assess pain intensity. Both nurses and physicians became familiar with evidence-based guidelines concerning postoperative pain. The entire process was monitored in three consecutive surveys and enrolled 2383 surgical inpatients. Pain indicators based on VAS and analgesic consumption were recorded during the first 72 postoperative hours. After a baseline survey about current practices of pain treatment, a nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised APS was implemented. The improvement in pain relief, expressed as VAS scores, was assessed in two further surveys. A quality manual was written and implemented. A major improvement in pain scores was observed after the APS inception (P < 0.001).
IMPLICATIONS: The implementation of an acute pain service, including pain assessment by a visual analog scale, standard multimodal pain treatment, and continuous quality evaluation, improved postoperative pain relief. Establishing teams of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses is the prerequisite for this improvement.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Pasero, K. Puntillo, D. Li, R. A. Mularski, M. J. Grap, B. L. Erstad, B. Varkey, H. C. Gilbert, J. Medina, and C. N. Sessler Structured Approaches to Pain Management in the ICU Chest, June 1, 2009; 135(6): 1665 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Voepel-Lewis, S. Malviya, A. R. Tait, S. Merkel, R. Foster, E. J. Krane, and P. J. Davis A Comparison of the Clinical Utility of Pain Assessment Tools for Children with Cognitive Impairment Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 72 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Leykin and T. Pellis A model of postanesthesia care unit-based acute pain service. Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2006; 103(1): 263 - 264. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. J. Goldstein, S. Jeck, A. S. Nicholas, M. J. Berman, and M. Lerario Preoperative Intravenous Morphine Sulfate With Postoperative Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Reduces Patient Analgesic Use After Total Abdominal Hysterectomy J Am Osteopath Assoc, June 1, 2005; 105(6): 273 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. D. Mcdonald, G. J. Thomas, K. E. Livingston, and J. S. Severson Assisting Older Adults to Communicate Their Postoperative Pain Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2005; 14(2): 109 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E. Frasco, J. Sprung, and T. L. Trentman The Impact of the Joint Commission for Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Pain Initiative on Perioperative Opiate Consumption and Recovery Room Length of Stay Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2005; 100(1): 162 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
