Anesth Analg 2003;96:253-259
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded Comparison Between Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine
Andrea Casati, MD*,
Battista Borghi, MD ,
Guido Fanelli, MD||,
Nicoletta Montone, MD ,
Roberto Rotini, MD ,
Gianfranco Fraschini, MD ,
Federico Vinciguerra, MD*,
Giorgio Torri, MD*, and
Jacques Chelly, MD, PhD, MBA¶
*Department of Anesthesiology and Orthopedic Surgery, Vita-Salute University of Milano, IRCCS H. San Raffaele; Department of Anesthesia Research and Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, IRCCS Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna; ||Department of Anesthesiology, University of Parma, Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma, Italy; and ¶Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Texas
Address correspondence and reprint requests to A. Casati, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS H. San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. Address e-mail to casati.andrea{at}hsr.it
We compared the onset time and quality of interscalene brachial plexus block produced with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in 50 patients undergoing open shoulder surgery randomly allocated to receive 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine (n = 25) or 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 25) injected through a 20-gauge catheter placed into the interscalene sheath using a 18-gauge insulated and stimulating Tuohy introducer. The block was also prolonged after surgery using a patient-controlled interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine or 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively (basal infusion rate, 6 mL/h; bolus, 2 mL; lockout period, 15 min; maximum boluses per hour, three). Three patients (two with levobupivacaine [8%] and one with ropivacaine [4%]) failed to achieve surgical block within 45 min after the injection and were excluded. The onset time of surgical block was 20 min (1040 min) with levobupivacaine and 20 min (545 min) with ropivacaine (P = 0.53). Rescue intraoperative analgesia (0.1 mg of fentanyl IV) was required in eight patients in each group (34%) (P = 0.99). Forty-two patients completed the 24-h postoperative infusion (22 with levobupivacaine and 20 with ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia was similarly effective in both groups. Total consumption of local anesthetic infused during the first 24 h was 147 mL (144196 mL) with levobupivacaine and 162 mL (144248 mL) with ropivacaine (P = 0.019), with a ratio between boluses received and requested of 0.8 (0.41.0) and 0.7 (0.41.0), respectively (P = 0.004). The degree of motor block of the operated limb was deeper with levobupivacaine than ropivacaine when starting postoperative analgesia; however, no further differences in degree of motor function were observed between the two groups. We conclude that 30 mL of levobupivacaine 0.5% induces an interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia of similar onset and intensity as the one produced by the same volume and concentration of ropivacaine. Postoperative interscalene analgesia with 0.125% levobupivacaine results in similar pain relief and recovery of motor function with less volume of local anesthetic than with 0.2% ropivacaine.
IMPLICATIONS: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study demonstrates that 30 mL of 0.5% levobupivacaine produces an interscalene brachial plexus block of similar onset and quality as the one produced by the same volume of 0.5% ropivacaine. When prolonging the block after surgery, 0.125% levobupivacaine provides adequate pain relief and recovery of motor function after open shoulder surgery, with less volume infused during the first 24 h after surgery than 0.2% ropivacaine.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Heid, N. Muller, T. Piepho, M. Bares, M. Giesa, P. Drees, A. Rumelin, and C. Werner
Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Peripheral Levobupivacaine and Ropivacaine: A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blind Trial in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Anesth. Analg.,
May 1, 2008;
106(5):
1559 - 1561.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Eroglu
A comparison of patient-controlled subacromial and i.v. analgesia after open acromioplasty surgery
Br. J. Anaesth.,
April 1, 2006;
96(4):
497 - 501.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Costello, J. R. Cormack, L. E. Mather, B. LaFerlita, M. A. Murphy, and K. Harris
Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following scalp block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy
Br. J. Anaesth.,
June 1, 2005;
94(6):
848 - 851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Ilfeld and F. K. Enneking
Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks at Home: A Review
Anesth. Analg.,
June 1, 2005;
100(6):
1822 - 1833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Casati, F. Vinciguerra, G. Cappelleri, G. Aldegheri, C. Grispigni, M. Putzu, and P. Rivoltini
Levobupivacaine 0.2% or 0.125% for Continuous Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison with 0.2% Ropivacaine
Anesth. Analg.,
September 1, 2004;
99(3):
919 - 923.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nadig, S. Blumenthal, G. Ekatodramis, A. Borgeat, A. Casati, G. Fanelli, and J. E. Chelly
Interscalene Brachial Plexus Anesthesia and Analgesia for Open Shoulder Surgery: What About Pharmacokinetics? * Response
Anesth. Analg.,
August 1, 2003;
97(2):
605 - 606.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|