JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khan, Z. H. Articles by Ebrahimkhani, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khan, Z. H. Articles by Ebrahimkhani, E. Related Collections Airway

---

GENERAL ARTICLES

A Comparison of the Upper Lip Bite Test (a Simple New Technique) with Modified Mallampati Classification in Predicting Difficulty in Endotracheal Intubation: A Prospective Blinded Study

Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Zahid Hussain Khan, MD, Department of Anesthesiology/Neurosurgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran 14197, Iran. Address e-mail to arash_kashfi{at}hotmail.com

We explored the possibility that a simple and single test could replace the modified Mallampati score for either a difficult or an unaccomplished tracheal intubation in an impending hypoxic patient. Three hundred adult patients were enrolled in this study. They were subjected to the following assessments: 1) oropharyngeal class according to the modified Mallampati criteria; 2) the new, upper lip bite criteria—class I = lower incisors can bite the upper lip above the vermilion line, class II = lower incisors can bite the upper lip below the vermilion line, and class III = lower incisors cannot bite the upper lip; and 3) laryngeal view grading according to Cormack’s criteria. The incidence of difficult intubation was 5.7%. The upper lip bite test showed significantly higher specificity and accuracy than the modified Mallampati test (P < 0.001). Comparisons of sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, between the two tests, however, did not reveal any significant differences (P > 0.05). In conclusion, the upper lip bite test is an acceptable option for predicting difficult intubation as a simple, single test.

IMPLICATIONS: Airway management continues to be a challenge despite substantial advances in this field. We found that the upper lip bite test, a reasonably easy test, was more predictive of a difficult airway than the modified Mallampati score.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M.-H. Tremblay, S. Williams, A. Robitaille, and P. Drolet Poor Visualization During Direct Laryngoscopy and High Upper Lip Bite Test Score Are Predictors of Difficult Intubation with the GlideScope(R) Videolaryngoscope Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2008; 106(5): 1495 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. H. Khan The Upper Lip Bite Test to Predict Difficult Intubation Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 669 - 669. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Tong and A. J. Gait The Upper Lip Bite Test to Predict Difficult Intubation Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 668 - 669. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. H. Khan, M. Gharabaghian, F. Nilli, M. Ghiamat, and M. Mohammadi Easy Endotracheal Intubation of a Patient Suffering from Both Cushing's and Nelson's Syndromes Predicted by the Upper Lip Bite Test Despite a Mallampati Class 4 Airway Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 786 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. H. Khan and S. Arbabi The reliability and validity of the Upper Lip Bite Test compared with the Mallampati classification to predict difficult laryngoscopy. Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2006; 103(2): 497 - 497. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lee, L. T. Y. Fan, T. Gin, M. K. Karmakar, and W. D. Ngan Kee A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2006; 102(6): 1867 - 1878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Eberhart, C. Arndt, T. Cierpka, J. Schwanekamp, H. Wulf, and C. Putzke Reliability Measurement with Unreliable Method Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 648 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Eghtesadi-Araghi and S. M. Marashi Reliability Measurement with Unreliable Method Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2006; 102(2): 647 - 648. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. H. J. Eberhart, C. Arndt, T. Cierpka, J. Schwanekamp, H. Wulf, and C. Putzke The Reliability and Validity of the Upper Lip Bite Test Compared with the Mallampati Classification to Predict Difficult Laryngoscopy: An External Prospective Evaluation Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2005; 101(1): 284 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Fang, J. Norris, V. K. Grover, R. Mahajan, T. Ezri, P. Szmuk, Y. Cohen, and R. D. Warters Class Zero Airway and Laryngoscopy * Response * Response Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2004; 98(3): 870 - 871. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Tewari, Z. H. Khan, and A. Kashfi Alas, Too Big a Bite! * Response Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2003; 97(4): 1199 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Herschman, Z. H. Khan, and A. Kashfi Evaluating a Patient's Airway * Response Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2003; 97(3): 915 - 916. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Difficult Airway Assessment: Bite Your Lip! Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, March 12, 2003; 2003(312): 11 - 11. [Full Text]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999